↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWW399-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:29:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.82s 6.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  12 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn  15   !;   0   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3))
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_2) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    nil != x1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_1) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_2) ).

fof(f15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_1) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3))
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    nil != x1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_174,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = lseg(x1,nil),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_175,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = sep(iPr_def_10,emp),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_176,negated_conjecture,
    ~ heap(iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_174,c_175]) ).

tcf(c_564,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),X2))
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_2387,plain,
    ( heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp))
    | ( nil = x1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_564]) ).

tcf(c_2390,plain,
    ( heap(iPr_def_11)
    | ( nil = x1 ) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2387,c_174,c_175]) ).

tcf(c_2391,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2390,c_176,c_74]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW399-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.40  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/5.40  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 22:17:25 UTC 2026
% 0.04/5.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/5.40  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.04/5.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.04/5.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.04/5.48  
% 0.04/5.48  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.04/5.48  
% 0.04/5.48  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.04/5.49  % Proving...
% 3.82/6.46  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.82/6.46  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.82/6.46  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Proving...
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % 
% 3.82/6.46  % clauses                               16
% 3.82/6.46  % conjectures                           1
% 3.82/6.46  % EPR                                   2
% 3.82/6.46  % Horn                                  13
% 3.82/6.46  % unary                                 9
% 3.82/6.46  % binary                                4
% 3.82/6.46  % lits                                  26
% 3.82/6.46  % lits eq                               11
% 3.82/6.46  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.82/6.46  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.82/6.46  % fd_cond                               1
% 3.82/6.46  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 3.82/6.46  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ 
% 3.82/6.46  % Current options:
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % ------ Proving...
% 3.82/6.46  % 
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.82/6.46  
% 3.82/6.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------