%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.7
% Problem : SWW400-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:09:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.92s 5.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW400-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 07:04:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.49/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 4.92/5.02 %-------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 % File :CSE---1.7
% 4.92/5.02 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 4.92/5.02 % Transform :cnf
% 4.92/5.02 % Format :tptp:raw
% 4.92/5.02 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 % Result :Theorem 4.410000s
% 4.92/5.02 % Output :CNFRefutation 4.410000s
% 4.92/5.02 %-------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 % File : SWW400-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 4.92/5.02 % Domain : Software Verification
% 4.92/5.02 % Problem : Verification Condition generated by Smallfoot
% 4.92/5.02 % Version : Especial.
% 4.92/5.02 % English : This is one of the verification conditions that were gathered
% 4.92/5.02 % from the output of Smallfoot when checking assertions on list
% 4.92/5.02 % manipulating programs from its own benchmark suite.
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 % Refs : [BCO06] Berdine et al. (2006), Smallfoot: Modular Automatic As
% 4.92/5.02 % : [RN11] Rybalchenko & Navarro Perez (2011), Separation Logic +
% 4.92/5.02 % : [Nav11] Navarro Perez (2011), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 4.92/5.02 % Source : [Nav11]
% 4.92/5.02 % Names : smallfoot-vc28 [Nav11]
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 4.92/5.02 % Rating : 0.20 v8.2.0, 0.19 v8.1.0, 0.11 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.12 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.13 v6.4.0, 0.07 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.20 v6.1.0, 0.21 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.5.0, 0.30 v5.4.0, 0.25 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0
% 4.92/5.02 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% 4.92/5.02 % Number of literals : 25 ( 10 equ; 12 neg)
% 4.92/5.02 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 4.92/5.02 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 4.92/5.02 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 4.92/5.02 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 4.92/5.02 % Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn)
% 4.92/5.02 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 % Comments :
% 4.92/5.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 %----Include axioms for Lists in Separation Logic
% 4.92/5.02 include('Axioms/SWV013-0.ax').
% 4.92/5.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 cnf(premise_1,hypothesis,
% 4.92/5.02 nil != x1 ).
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
% 4.92/5.02 nil != x2 ).
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 cnf(premise_3,hypothesis,
% 4.92/5.02 heap(sep(next(x2,nil),sep(lseg(x1,x2),emp))) ).
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
% 4.92/5.02 ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)) ).
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 %-------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.02 % Proof found
% 4.92/5.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 4.92/5.02 % SZS output start Proof
% 4.92/5.02 %ClaNum:25(EqnAxiom:10)
% 4.92/5.02 %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:38)
% 4.92/5.02 %MaxLitNum:3
% 4.92/5.02 %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 4.92/5.02 %SharedTerms:14
% 4.92/5.02 %goalClause: 16
% 4.92/5.02 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 4.92/5.02 [14]~E(a7,a4)
% 4.92/5.02 [15]~E(a4,a6)
% 4.92/5.02 [16]~P1(f3(f1(a7,a4),a2))
% 4.92/5.02 [13]P1(f3(f5(a6,a4),f3(f1(a7,a6),a2)))
% 4.92/5.02 [11]E(f3(f1(x111,x111),x112),x112)
% 4.92/5.02 [17]~P1(f3(f5(a4,x171),x172))
% 4.92/5.02 [12]E(f3(x121,f3(x122,x123)),f3(x122,f3(x121,x123)))
% 4.92/5.02 [18]~P1(f3(f5(x181,x182),f3(f5(x181,x183),x184)))
% 4.92/5.02 [19]E(x191,a4)+~P1(f3(f1(a4,x191),x192))
% 4.92/5.02 [22]P1(f3(f1(x221,a4),x222))+~P1(f3(f1(x221,x223),f3(f1(x223,a4),x222)))
% 4.92/5.02 [20]E(x201,x202)+~P1(f3(f5(x201,x203),f3(f1(x201,x202),x204)))
% 4.92/5.02 [24]P1(f3(f1(x241,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244)))+~P1(f3(f1(x241,x245),f3(f1(x245,x242),f3(f5(x242,x243),x244))))
% 4.92/5.02 [21]E(x211,x212)+E(x211,x213)+~P1(f3(f1(x211,x213),f3(f1(x211,x212),x214)))
% 4.92/5.02 [23]E(x231,x232)+P1(f3(f1(x231,x233),x234))+~P1(f3(f5(x231,x232),f3(f1(x232,x233),x234)))
% 4.92/5.02 [25]E(x251,x252)+P1(f3(f1(x253,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254)))+~P1(f3(f1(x253,x255),f3(f1(x255,x251),f3(f1(x251,x252),x254))))
% 4.92/5.02 %EqnAxiom
% 4.92/5.02 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 4.92/5.02 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 4.92/5.02 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 4.92/5.02 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41,x43),f1(x42,x43))
% 4.92/5.02 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f1(x53,x51),f1(x53,x52))
% 4.92/5.02 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 4.92/5.02 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 4.92/5.02 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83),f5(x82,x83))
% 4.92/5.02 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91),f5(x93,x92))
% 4.92/5.02 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 4.92/5.02
% 4.92/5.02 %-------------------------------------------
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(26,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (E(x261,f3(f1(x262,x262),x261))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,2])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(27,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (~P1(f3(f1(x271,x271),f3(f1(a7,a4),a2)))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,11,2,10])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(28,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (E(f3(f1(x281,x281),x282),x282)),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(rename_variables,[],[11])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(29,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (~E(a7,f3(f1(x291,x291),a4))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,14,11,28,2,10,3])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(31,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (P1(f3(f1(x311,x311),f3(f5(a6,a4),f3(f1(a7,a6),a2))))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,13,10])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(33,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (~E(a7,f3(f1(x331,x331),f3(f1(x332,x332),a4)))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,29,13,11,10,3])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(39,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (E(a6,a4)+P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),f3(f1(a7,a6),a2)))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[31,33,12,11,10,3,23])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(139,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (~P1(f3(f1(a7,x1391),f3(f1(x1391,a4),a2)))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,27,22,10])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(395,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 (P1(f3(f1(a6,a4),f3(f1(a7,a6),a2)))),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,2,39])).
% 4.92/5.03 cnf(430,plain,
% 4.92/5.03 ($false),
% 4.92/5.03 inference(scs_inference,[],[395,139,12,10]),
% 4.92/5.03 ['proof']).
% 4.92/5.03 % SZS output end Proof
% 4.92/5.03 % Total time :4.410000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------