↑ Up

Otter---3.3.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:22:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 1.97s
% Output   : Refutation 1.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   6 unt;   1 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   3 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))
    | A = B
    | heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)) ),
    file('SWW421-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    x2 != x1,
    file('SWW421-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)),
    file('SWW421-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    sep(A,sep(B,C)) = sep(B,sep(A,C)),
    file('SWW421-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
    file('SWW421-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(170,plain,
    heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x3),emp))),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,21]),
    [iquote('para_from,18.1.1,21.1.1')] ).

cnf(225,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[170,6]),12,15]),
    [iquote('hyper,170,6,unit_del,12,15')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 03:00:36 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.77/1.97  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.77/1.97  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 1.77/1.97  Wed Jul 27 03:00:36 2022
% 1.77/1.97  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 7952.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.77/1.97  set(auto).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.77/1.97  clear(print_given).
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  list(usable).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] A=A.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] sep(S,sep(T,Sigma))=sep(T,sep(S,Sigma)).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] sep(lseg(X,X),Sigma)=Sigma.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(next(nil,Y),Sigma)).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(nil,Y),Sigma))|Y=nil.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(next(X,Z),Sigma))).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)))|X=Z.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)))|X=Y|X=Z.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),Sigma)))|X=Y|heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),Sigma)).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,nil),Sigma)))|heap(sep(lseg(X,nil),Sigma)).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),sep(next(Z,W),Sigma))))|heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),sep(next(Z,W),Sigma))).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),sep(lseg(Z,W),Sigma))))|Z=W|heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),sep(lseg(Z,W),Sigma))).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] nil!=x1.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] x2!=x1.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] x1!=x3.
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))).
% 1.77/1.97  0 [] -heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)).
% 1.77/1.97  end_of_list.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.77/1.97  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.77/1.97  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.77/1.97  clauses in usable.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.77/1.97     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ------------> process usable:
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -heap(sep(next(nil,A),B)).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 2 [] -heap(sep(lseg(nil,A),B))|A=nil.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(next(A,C),D))).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 4 [] -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(A,C),D)))|A=C.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 5 [] -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(A,C),D)))|A=B|A=C.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=19): 6 [] -heap(sep(next(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),D)))|A=B|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),D)).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 7 [] -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(B,nil),C)))|heap(sep(lseg(A,nil),C)).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=24): 8 [] -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),sep(next(C,D),E))))|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),sep(next(C,D),E))).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=27): 9 [] -heap(sep(lseg(A,B),sep(lseg(B,C),sep(lseg(C,D),E))))|C=D|heap(sep(lseg(A,C),sep(lseg(C,D),E))).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [copy,10,flip.1] x1!=nil.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 12 [] x2!=x1.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [copy,13,flip.1] x3!=x1.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 15 [] -heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)).
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ------------> process sos:
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] A=A.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 18 [] sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 19 [] sep(lseg(A,A),B)=B.
% 1.77/1.97  ---> New Demodulator: 20 [new_demod,19] sep(lseg(A,A),B)=B.
% 1.77/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 21 [] heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))).
% 1.77/1.97    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.77/1.97    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] sep(A,sep(B,C))=sep(B,sep(A,C)).
% 1.77/1.97  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 20.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.02 sec ----> 225 [hyper,170,6,unit_del,12,15] $F.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  Length of proof is 1.  Level of proof is 1.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.77/1.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.77/1.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.77/1.97  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ============ end of search ============
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.77/1.97  clauses given                  8
% 1.77/1.97  clauses generated            275
% 1.77/1.97  clauses kept                 221
% 1.77/1.97  clauses forward subsumed      64
% 1.77/1.97  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.77/1.97  Kbytes malloced             2929
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.77/1.97  user CPU time          0.02          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.77/1.97  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.77/1.97  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.77/1.97  
% 1.77/1.97  Process 7952 finished Wed Jul 27 03:00:38 2022
% 1.77/1.97  Otter interrupted
% 1.77/1.97  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------