%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:25:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 3 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associative_commutative,axiom,
sep(X,sep(Y,Z)) = sep(Y,sep(X,Z)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).
cnf(unfolding_2,axiom,
( ~ heap(sep(next(X,Y),sep(lseg(Y,Z),U)))
| X = Y
| heap(sep(lseg(X,Z),U)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',unfolding_2) ).
cnf(premise_2,hypothesis,
x2 != x1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_2) ).
cnf(premise_4,hypothesis,
heap(sep(lseg(x2,x3),sep(next(x1,x2),emp))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_4) ).
cnf(16,plain,
heap(sep(next(x1,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x3),emp))),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[premise_4,associative_commutative,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(conclusion_1,negated_conjecture,
~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,x3),emp)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conclusion_1) ).
cnf(41,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[unfolding_2,16,premise_2,conclusion_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SWW421-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 21:49:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.49 *
% 0.20/0.50 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.50 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.50 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.50 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.50 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.50 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 "."
% 0.20/0.50 *
% 0.20/0.50 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T21:49:53
% 0.20/0.50 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n027.cluster.edu at 2022-06-05T21:49:53
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 #||
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 ||#
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 101 formulas have been input or derived (from 15 formulas).
% 0.20/0.54 ; 41 (41%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.54 ; 40 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.003 7% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 2% Assert (16 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.006 15% Process new row (84 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.002 5% Resolution (28 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 2% Paramodulation (14 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 2% Condensing (18 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (18 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 2% Backward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (7 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.001 2% Forward simplification (84 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.002 5% Backward simplification (40 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (158 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.023 56% Other
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.041 Total
% 0.20/0.54 ; 0.043 Real time
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; Term-hash-array has 155 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 127 nodes (127 at peak, 127 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 8 possibly forward subsuming rows in 18 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Path-index has 160 entries (160 at peak, 160 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Path-index has 195 nodes (195 at peak, 195 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Trie-index has 160 entries (160 at peak, 160 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Trie-index has 398 nodes (398 at peak, 398 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 229 generalization terms in 275 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 32 instance terms in 28 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ; Retrieved 326 unifiable terms in 115 calls.
% 0.20/0.54 ;
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to process has 10 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value 5 3 with value 15 1 with value 28
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value 10 1 with value 23 2 with value 33
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value 14
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 2 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value 33 1 with value 37
% 0.20/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to give has 23 entries:
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 10) 1 with value (4 18) 1 with value (4 24)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 13) 1 with value (4 19) 1 with value (4 26)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 13 with value (4 15) 1 with value (4 20) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.20/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 17) 1 with value (4 22)
% 0.20/0.54 Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.54 0.044 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.54 0.040369 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.54 0.003198 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.54 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.54 0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.54 2,329,392 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-05T21:49:53
% 0.20/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.54 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------