↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWW443-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:29:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.51s 25.95s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  26 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  17   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  15 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  54   !;   0   ?;  45   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',associative_commutative) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',normalization) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X2
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SWV013-0.ax',wellformedness_5) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    x2 != x8,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_8) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    x1 != x14,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_19) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    x14 != x1,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    x5 != x15,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_22) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    x15 != x5,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f45,axiom,
    heap(sep(lseg(x10,x1),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x12,x13),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x12),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),emp)))))))))))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',premise_23) ).

tcf(c_91,plain,
    x2 != x8,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_102,plain,
    x14 != x1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    x15 != x5,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x10,x1),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x12,x13),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x12),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),emp)))))))))))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_108,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X2 )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_109,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_110,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_186,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x1,x3),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x12,x13),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp)))))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_403,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X3 )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ heap(sep(lseg(X0,X1),sep(X2,sep(lseg(X0,X3),X4)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_108]) ).

tcf(c_433,plain,
    ( ( x14 = x1 )
    | ( x3 = x1 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_108]) ).

tcf(c_434,plain,
    x3 = x1,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_433,c_102]) ).

tcf(c_435,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x1,x1),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x12,x13),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp)))))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_434]) ).

tcf(c_444,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X3 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(lseg(X1,X3),X4)))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_403]) ).

tcf(c_474,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X4 )
      | ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(lseg(X1,X2),sep(X3,sep(lseg(X1,X4),X5))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_444]) ).

tcf(c_513,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = X4 )
      | ( X2 = X3 )
      | ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(lseg(X2,X4),X5))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_474]) ).

tcf(c_546,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
      ( ( X2 = X5 )
      | ( X2 = X3 )
      | ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(lseg(X2,X3),sep(X4,sep(lseg(X2,X5),X6)))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_513]) ).

tcf(c_639,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
      ( ( X3 = X5 )
      | ( X3 = X4 )
      | ~ heap(sep(X0,sep(X1,sep(X2,sep(lseg(X3,X4),sep(lseg(X3,X5),X6)))))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_546]) ).

tcf(c_1317,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x12),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x12,x13),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp))))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_435,c_110,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_1320,plain,
    ( ( x2 = x8 )
    | ( x5 = x2 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1317,c_474]) ).

tcf(c_1323,plain,
    ( ( x2 = x8 )
    | ( x18 = x2 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1317,c_513]) ).

tcf(c_1326,plain,
    ( ( x2 = x12 )
    | ( x2 = x8 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1317,c_639]) ).

tcf(c_1327,plain,
    x2 = x12,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1326,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_1328,plain,
    x18 = x2,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1323,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_1329,plain,
    x5 = x2,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1320,c_91]) ).

tcf(c_1330,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x2,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x18),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x18,x15),sep(lseg(x9,x5),sep(lseg(x2,x13),sep(lseg(x7,x5),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp))))))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1317,c_1327]) ).

tcf(c_1335,plain,
    x15 != x2,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_1329]) ).

tcf(c_3956,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x2,x2),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x2,x15),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x2,x13),sep(lseg(x7,x2),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp))))))))))))),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1330,c_1328,c_1329]) ).

tcf(c_3957,plain,
    heap(sep(lseg(x1,x14),sep(lseg(x2,x13),sep(lseg(x2,x15),sep(lseg(x2,x8),sep(lseg(x11,x9),sep(lseg(x11,x7),sep(lseg(x9,x2),sep(lseg(x7,x2),sep(lseg(x10,x1),emp)))))))))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3956,c_110,c_109]) ).

tcf(c_3964,plain,
    ( ( x2 = x8 )
    | ( x15 = x2 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3957,c_513]) ).

tcf(c_4002,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3964,c_91,c_1335]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWW443-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.34   % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34   % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34   % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34   % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34   % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/25.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/25.27  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/25.27  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 22:23:34 UTC 2026
% 0.03/25.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/25.27  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/25.29  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/25.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/25.30  
% 0.18/25.30  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.18/25.30  
% 0.18/25.30  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.18/25.30  % Proving...
% 3.51/25.95  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/25.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.51/25.95  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.51/25.95  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Proving...
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % 
% 3.51/25.95  % clauses                               27
% 3.51/25.95  % conjectures                           0
% 3.51/25.95  % EPR                                   22
% 3.51/25.95  % Horn                                  25
% 3.51/25.95  % unary                                 25
% 3.51/25.95  % binary                                0
% 3.51/25.95  % lits                                  31
% 3.51/25.95  % lits eq                               27
% 3.51/25.95  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.51/25.95  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.51/25.95  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.51/25.95  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 3.51/25.95  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ 
% 3.51/25.95  % Current options:
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % ------ Proving...
% 3.51/25.95  % 
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.51/25.95  
% 3.51/25.95  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------