↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWW469_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:29:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  15   ~;   4   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :    3 (   3 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn   9   !;   7   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    sK0: state ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    sK1: state ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    sK2: state ).

tff(type_def_5,type,
    state: $tType ).

tff(f1,axiom,
    ( hoare_1310879719gleton
  <=> ? [X0: state,X1: state] : ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_0_state__not__singleton__def) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    hoare_1310879719gleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

tff(f6,conjecture,
    ! [X0: state] :
      ~ ! [X1: state] : ( X1 = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

tff(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: state] :
        ~ ! [X1: state] : ( X1 = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f6]) ).

tff(f8,plain,
    ( hoare_1310879719gleton
   => ? [X0: state,X1: state] : ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f1]) ).

tff(f12,plain,
    ( ~ hoare_1310879719gleton
    | ? [X0: state,X1: state] : ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ? [X0: state] :
    ! [X1: state] : ( X1 = X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f14,plain,
    ( ~ hoare_1310879719gleton
    | ( sK0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f12]) ).

tff(f15,plain,
    ! [X1: state] : ( sK2 = X1 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK2)],[f13]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ~ hoare_1310879719gleton
    | ( sK0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    hoare_1310879719gleton,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ! [X1: state] : ( sK2 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ hoare_1310879719gleton
    | ( sK0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    hoare_1310879719gleton,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0_state: state] : X0_state = sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0_state: state] : X0_state = iProver_smallest_state,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    iProver_smallest_state != iProver_smallest_state,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW469_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 22:33:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 0.47/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.47/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.47/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.47/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 0.47/1.28  % 
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.47/1.28  
% 0.47/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------