%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.54s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_7ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_10ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
hoare_1310879719gleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_10,plain,
esk1_0 != esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ induct_false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
induct_true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_induct__trueI]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWW469_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:58:36 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1185086 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.54 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.54 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1185087 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.54 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.54 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 % No proof found!
% 0.23/0.54 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.54 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.23/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Initial clauses : 10
% 0.23/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.23/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.23/0.54 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.23/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.23/0.54 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.23/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.23/0.54 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 184
% 0.23/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 37
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.54 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.54 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.23/0.54
% 0.23/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.54 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.23/0.54 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/0.54 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.23/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------