↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW474^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:40:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.09s 0.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW474^3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.19  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 16:06:18 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.32/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p
% 1.09/0.77  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 1.09/0.77  % partial match(2): HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA
% 1.09/0.77  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSLSSSSLCHSA.
% 1.09/0.77  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting ehoh_best7 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting new_bool_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting new_ho_11 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % new_bool_8 with pid 975640 completed with status 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Result found by new_bool_8
% 1.09/0.77  % partial match(2): HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA
% 1.09/0.77  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSLSSSSLCHSA.
% 1.09/0.77  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting ehoh_best7 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting new_bool_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 1.09/0.77  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 1.09/0.77  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBN
% 1.09/0.77  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % SubtermCWHack with pid 975660 completed with status 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.09/0.77  % partial match(2): HSLMSMSSSSLCHSA
% 1.09/0.77  % Preprocessing class: HMLMSLSSSSLCHSA.
% 1.09/0.77  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting pre_casc_6 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting ehoh_best7 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting new_bool_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0))
% 1.09/0.77  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
% 1.09/0.77  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBN
% 1.09/0.77  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.09/0.77  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.09/0.77  % Preprocessing time       : 0.008 s
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  % Proof found!
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_sort1, type, pname: $tType).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_sort2, type, hoare_1708887482_state: $tType).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_sort3, type, com: $tType).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_sort4, type, option_com: $tType).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_25, type, wt: com > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_26, type, wT_bodies: $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_27, type, body: pname > option_com).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_28, type, body_1: pname > com).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_88, type, hoare_Mirabelle_MGT: com > hoare_1708887482_state).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_89, type, hoare_90032982_state: (hoare_1708887482_state > $o) > (hoare_1708887482_state > $o) > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_91, type, hoare_1160767572gleton: $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_108, type, dom_pname_com: (pname > option_com) > pname > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_121, type, some_com: com > option_com).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_127, type, the_com: option_com > com).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_134, type, bot_bo19817387tate_o: hoare_1708887482_state > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_168, type, image_1116629049_state: (pname > hoare_1708887482_state) > (pname > $o) > hoare_1708887482_state > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_179, type, insert528405184_state: hoare_1708887482_state > (hoare_1708887482_state > $o) > hoare_1708887482_state > $o).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_197, type, pn: pname).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_198, type, y: com).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_300, type, esk64_0: pname > hoare_1708887482_state).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(decl_301, type, esk65_0: pname > hoare_1708887482_state).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(fact_297_WT__bodiesD, axiom, ![X19:pname, X707:com]:(((wT_bodies)=>(((body @ X19)=(some_com @ X707))=>(wt @ X707)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', fact_297_WT__bodiesD)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(fact_374_the_Osimps, axiom, ![X948:com]:(((the_com @ (some_com @ X948))=(X948))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', fact_374_the_Osimps)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(conj_1, hypothesis, (wT_bodies), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', conj_1)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(fact_66_MGF, axiom, ![X153:com]:(((hoare_1160767572gleton)=>((wT_bodies)=>((wt @ X153)=>(hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ X153) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', fact_66_MGF)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(conj_5, hypothesis, ((body @ pn)=(some_com @ y)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', conj_5)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(conj_7, conjecture, (hoare_90032982_state @ (image_1116629049_state @ (^[X887:pname]:(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (body_1 @ X887))) @ (dom_pname_com @ body)) @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', conj_7)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(fact_4_cut, axiom, ![X10:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X11:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X12:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:(((hoare_90032982_state @ X11 @ X12)=>((hoare_90032982_state @ X10 @ X11)=>(hoare_90032982_state @ X10 @ X12)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', fact_4_cut)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(fact_0_empty, axiom, ![X1:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:((hoare_90032982_state @ X1 @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', fact_0_empty)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(conj_0, hypothesis, (hoare_1160767572gleton), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.oclVmPgstX/E---3.1_975546.p', conj_0)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X4427:pname, X4428:com]:((~(wT_bodies)|(((body @ X4427)!=(some_com @ X4428))|(wt @ X4428)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_297_WT__bodiesD])])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X4648:com]:(((the_com @ (some_com @ X4648))=(X4648))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_374_the_Osimps])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X19:pname, X48:com]:(((wt @ X48)|~((wT_bodies))|((body @ X19)!=(some_com @ X48)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_12, hypothesis, (wT_bodies), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X4426:com]:((~(hoare_1160767572gleton)|(~(wT_bodies)|(~(wt @ X4426)|(hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ X4426) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_66_MGF])])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X5773:pname]:(((esk64_0 @ X5773)=(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (the_com @ (body @ X5773))))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X48:com]:(((the_com @ (some_com @ X48))=(X48))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_16, hypothesis, ((body @ pn)=(some_com @ y)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_5])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X19:pname, X48:com]:(((wt @ X48)|((body @ X19)!=(some_com @ X48)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ~((hoare_90032982_state @ (image_1116629049_state @ (^[X887:pname]:(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (body_1 @ X887))) @ (dom_pname_com @ body)) @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_7])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X4683:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X4684:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X4685:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:((~(hoare_90032982_state @ X4684 @ X4685)|(~(hoare_90032982_state @ X4683 @ X4684)|(hoare_90032982_state @ X4683 @ X4685)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_4_cut])])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X4674:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:((hoare_90032982_state @ X4674 @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_0_empty])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_21, plain, ![X48:com]:(((hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ X48) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o))|~((hoare_1160767572gleton))|~((wT_bodies))|~((wt @ X48)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_22, hypothesis, (hoare_1160767572gleton), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X19:pname]:(((esk64_0 @ X19)=(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (the_com @ (body @ X19))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_24, hypothesis, ((the_com @ (body @ pn))=(y)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_25, hypothesis, ![X19:pname]:(((wt @ y)|((body @ X19)!=(body @ pn)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_16])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ~(hoare_90032982_state @ (image_1116629049_state @ (^[Z0:pname]:(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (body_1 @ Z0))) @ (dom_pname_com @ body)) @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X3:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X2:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X1:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:(((hoare_90032982_state @ X3 @ X2)|~((hoare_90032982_state @ X1 @ X2))|~((hoare_90032982_state @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X1:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:((hoare_90032982_state @ X1 @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X48:com]:(((hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ X48) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o))|~((wt @ X48)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_12]), c_0_22])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_30, hypothesis, ((hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y)=(esk64_0 @ pn)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_31, hypothesis, (wt @ y), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ~(hoare_90032982_state @ (image_1116629049_state @ (^[Z0:pname]:(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (body_1 @ Z0))) @ (dom_pname_com @ body)) @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_33, plain, ![X5708:pname]:(((esk65_0 @ X5708)=(hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ (body_1 @ X5708)))), introduced(definition)).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X1:hoare_1708887482_state > $o, X2:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:(((hoare_90032982_state @ X1 @ X2)|~((hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ X2)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_35, hypothesis, (hoare_90032982_state @ bot_bo19817387tate_o @ (insert528405184_state @ (esk64_0 @ pn) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30]), c_0_31])])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ~((((hoare_90032982_state @ (image_1116629049_state @ esk65_0 @ (dom_pname_com @ body)) @ (insert528405184_state @ (hoare_Mirabelle_MGT @ y) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o)))=(($true)))), inference(lift_lambdas,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]), c_0_33])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_37, hypothesis, ![X1:hoare_1708887482_state > $o]:((hoare_90032982_state @ X1 @ (insert528405184_state @ (esk64_0 @ pn) @ bot_bo19817387tate_o))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_35])).
% 1.09/0.77  thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]), c_0_30]), c_0_37])]), ['proof']).
% 1.09/0.77  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 1.09/0.77  % Parsed axioms                        : 1408
% 1.09/0.77  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 940
% 1.09/0.77  % Initial clauses                      : 714
% 1.09/0.77  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 1.09/0.77  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 695
% 1.09/0.77  % Processed clauses                    : 3344
% 1.09/0.77  % ...of these trivial                  : 144
% 1.09/0.77  % ...subsumed                          : 2251
% 1.09/0.77  % ...remaining for further processing  : 948
% 1.09/0.77  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 114
% 1.09/0.77  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Backward-subsumed                    : 8
% 1.09/0.77  % Backward-rewritten                   : 26
% 1.09/0.77  % Generated clauses                    : 14934
% 1.09/0.77  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12224
% 1.09/0.77  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Paramodulations                      : 14574
% 1.09/0.77  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Equation resolutions                 : 123
% 1.09/0.77  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4806
% 1.09/0.77  % ...of those cached                   : 4153
% 1.09/0.77  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.09/0.77  % Current number of processed clauses  : 834
% 1.09/0.77  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 176
% 1.09/0.77  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 1.09/0.77  %    Negative unit clauses             : 29
% 1.09/0.77  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 622
% 1.09/0.77  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9477
% 1.09/0.77  % ...number of literals in the above   : 21346
% 1.09/0.77  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Current number of archived clauses   : 62
% 1.09/0.77  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 98610
% 1.09/0.77  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 78351
% 1.09/0.77  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1988
% 1.09/0.77  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1855
% 1.09/0.77  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 317
% 1.09/0.77  % BW rewrite match successes           : 64
% 1.09/0.77  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.09/0.77  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 193107
% 1.09/0.77  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 23526
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/0.77  % User time                : 0.219 s
% 1.09/0.77  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 1.09/0.77  % Total time               : 0.245 s
% 1.09/0.77  % Maximum resident set size: 9940 pages
% 1.09/0.77  
% 1.09/0.77  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.09/0.77  % User time                : 0.282 s
% 1.09/0.77  % System time              : 0.038 s
% 1.09/0.77  % Total time               : 0.319 s
% 1.09/0.77  % Maximum resident set size: 8448 pages
% 1.09/0.77  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------