%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : SWW619_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:30:33 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.42s 1.68s % Output : Refutation 1.42s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWW619_2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v6.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 21:39:51 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.48 % Using integer theory % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 1.42/1.68 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 1.42/1.68 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu % 1.42/1.68 SPASS derived 76 clauses, backtracked 25 clauses and kept 310 clauses. % 1.42/1.68 SPASS backtracked 3 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 1.42/1.68 SPASS allocated 7147 KBytes. % 1.42/1.68 SPASS spent 0:00:00.14 on the problem. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.01 for the input. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.06 for the reduction. % 1.42/1.68 0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 5 : % 1.42/1.68 43[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(0,times(skc18,skc17))*. % 1.42/1.68 44[0:Inp] || -> less(times(skc18,skc17),skc14)*. % 1.42/1.68 132[0:Inp] || sorted_sub3(tb2t8(mk_array1(elt5,skc14,t2tb9(skc16))),times(skc18,skc17),min(skc14,plus(times(skc18,skc17),skc17)))* -> . % 1.42/1.68 179[0:Inp] || equal(U,plus(times(V,skc17),skc17))* equal(W,times(V,skc17))* less(times(V,skc17),skc14)* lesseq(0,times(V,skc17)) -> sorted_sub3(tb2t8(mk_array1(elt5,skc14,t2tb9(skc16))),W,min(skc14,U))*. % 1.42/1.68 455(e)[0:ThR:179,132,44,43] || -> . % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_32323_n022.cluster.edu % 1.42/1.68 % 1.42/1.68 Formulae used in the proof : fof_bridgeL fof_wP_parameter_bottom_up_mergesort fof_match_bool fof_permut_sub_def % 1.49/1.68 % 1.49/1.68 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------