↑ Up

Princess---230619.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW751_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:51:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 29.64s 4.75s
% Output   : Proof 41.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWW751_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 19:11:42 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 15.87/2.94  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 15.87/2.94  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 15.87/2.95  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 15.87/2.95  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 15.87/2.96  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 15.87/2.96  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 17.61/3.14  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 29.64/4.72  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.64/4.72  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.64/4.73  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 29.64/4.75  Prover 3: proved (4112ms)
% 29.64/4.75  Prover 6: proved (4097ms)
% 29.64/4.75  
% 29.64/4.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.64/4.75  
% 29.64/4.76  
% 29.64/4.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.64/4.76  
% 29.64/4.78  Prover 0: stopped
% 29.64/4.78  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 29.64/4.78  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 29.64/4.78  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 30.83/4.94  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.83/4.96  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.83/4.96  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 30.83/4.96  Prover 2: stopped
% 31.58/4.98  Prover 1: Found proof (size 1)
% 31.58/4.98  Prover 1: proved (4337ms)
% 31.58/4.98  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 31.58/4.98  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.72/4.99  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 31.72/4.99  Prover 4: stopped
% 35.91/5.55  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.91/5.55  Prover 5: stopped
% 37.90/5.87  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 37.90/5.87  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 38.61/5.97  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 38.97/6.00  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 39.36/6.08  Prover 10: stopped
% 39.36/6.10  Prover 7: stopped
% 39.72/6.12  Prover 11: stopped
% 41.41/6.46  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 41.41/6.47  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 41.41/6.48  Prover 8: stopped
% 41.41/6.48  
% 41.41/6.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 41.41/6.48  
% 41.41/6.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 41.41/6.49  Assumptions after simplification:
% 41.41/6.49  ---------------------------------
% 41.41/6.49  
% 41.41/6.49    (formula_3)
% 41.41/6.49    $false
% 41.41/6.49  
% 41.41/6.49  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 41.41/6.49  --------------------------------------------
% 41.41/6.49  formula_1, formula_2
% 41.41/6.49  
% 41.41/6.49  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 41.41/6.49  ---------------------------------
% 41.41/6.49  
% 41.41/6.49  Begin of proof
% 41.41/6.50  | 
% 41.41/6.50  | CLOSE: (formula_3) is inconsistent.
% 41.41/6.50  | 
% 41.41/6.50  End of proof
% 41.41/6.50  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 41.41/6.50  
% 41.41/6.50  5886ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------