%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWW817_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:51:27 EDT 2023 % Result : Unsatisfiable 21.01s 3.52s % Output : Proof 25.92s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW817_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % 0.07/0.14 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 17:53:49 EDT 2023 % 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.62 ________ _____ % 0.21/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.21/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.21/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.21/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.21/0.62 (2023-06-19) % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.21/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.21/0.62 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.21/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.21/0.62 % 0.21/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.21/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.21/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 0.21/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 1.92/0.94 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.92/0.94 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 7.36/1.72 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.72 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.72 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.72 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.72 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.72 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 7.36/1.73 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 20.10/3.39 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 21.01/3.47 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 21.01/3.48 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.01/3.50 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 21.01/3.51 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.01/3.52 Prover 0: proved (2880ms) % 21.01/3.52 % 21.01/3.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 21.01/3.52 % 21.01/3.52 Prover 6: Proving ... % 21.01/3.52 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 21.01/3.53 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 21.01/3.53 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.01/3.53 Prover 6: stopped % 21.01/3.53 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1) % 21.01/3.53 Prover 4: proved (2893ms) % 21.01/3.53 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 21.01/3.54 Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 21.01/3.54 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.01/3.55 Prover 1: stopped % 21.01/3.55 Prover 3: stopped % 23.21/3.78 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 23.21/3.78 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 24.37/3.95 Prover 7: stopped % 24.37/3.96 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 24.37/3.96 Prover 5: stopped % 25.33/4.08 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 25.33/4.08 Prover 2: stopped % 25.54/4.19 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 25.92/4.23 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 25.92/4.23 Prover 8: stopped % 25.92/4.24 % 25.92/4.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 25.92/4.24 % 25.92/4.24 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 25.92/4.25 Assumptions after simplification: % 25.92/4.25 --------------------------------- % 25.92/4.25 % 25.92/4.25 (formula_101) % 25.92/4.26 $false % 25.92/4.26 % 25.92/4.26 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 25.92/4.26 -------------------------------------------- % 25.92/4.26 formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13, % 25.92/4.26 formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19, % 25.92/4.26 formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24, % 25.92/4.26 formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3, % 25.92/4.26 formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35, % 25.92/4.26 formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40, % 25.92/4.26 formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46, % 25.92/4.26 formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51, % 25.92/4.26 formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57, % 25.92/4.26 formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62, % 25.92/4.26 formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68, % 25.92/4.26 formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73, % 25.92/4.26 formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79, % 25.92/4.26 formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84, % 25.92/4.26 formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9, % 25.92/4.26 formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95, % 25.92/4.26 formula_96, formula_97, formula_98, formula_99 % 25.92/4.26 % 25.92/4.26 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 25.92/4.26 --------------------------------- % 25.92/4.26 % 25.92/4.26 Begin of proof % 25.92/4.26 | % 25.92/4.26 | CLOSE: (formula_101) is inconsistent. % 25.92/4.26 | % 25.92/4.26 End of proof % 25.92/4.27 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 25.92/4.27 % 25.92/4.27 3647ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------