%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : SWW819_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Sep 1 00:51:28 EDT 2023 % Result : Unsatisfiable 21.36s 3.60s % Output : Proof 24.49s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWW819_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 21:54:36 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 1.88/0.96 Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.96 Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.97 Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.97 Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.97 Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.97 Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 1.88/0.97 Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 8.66/1.91 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.91 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.91 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.91 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.92 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.92 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 8.66/1.92 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 20.62/3.51 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 20.62/3.51 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 20.62/3.55 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 20.62/3.59 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 20.62/3.59 Prover 0: proved (2955ms) % 20.62/3.59 % 21.36/3.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 21.36/3.60 % 21.36/3.62 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.36/3.62 Prover 4: Found proof (size 1) % 21.36/3.62 Prover 4: proved (2972ms) % 21.36/3.62 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 21.36/3.63 Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation % 21.36/3.63 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.36/3.63 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 21.36/3.63 Prover 6: Proving ... % 21.36/3.63 Prover 6: stopped % 21.36/3.64 Prover 1: stopped % 21.36/3.65 Prover 3: stopped % 22.83/3.88 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 23.47/3.98 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 23.47/3.98 Prover 5: stopped % 23.47/3.98 Prover 7: stopped % 24.49/4.12 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 24.49/4.12 Prover 2: stopped % 24.49/4.12 % 24.49/4.12 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 24.49/4.12 % 24.49/4.12 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 24.49/4.14 Assumptions after simplification: % 24.49/4.14 --------------------------------- % 24.49/4.14 % 24.49/4.14 (formula_101) % 24.49/4.14 $false % 24.49/4.14 % 24.49/4.14 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 24.49/4.14 -------------------------------------------- % 24.49/4.14 formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13, % 24.49/4.14 formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19, % 24.49/4.14 formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24, % 24.49/4.14 formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3, % 24.49/4.14 formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35, % 24.49/4.14 formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40, % 24.49/4.14 formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46, % 24.49/4.14 formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51, % 24.49/4.14 formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57, % 24.49/4.14 formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62, % 24.49/4.14 formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68, % 24.49/4.15 formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73, % 24.49/4.15 formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79, % 24.49/4.15 formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84, % 24.49/4.15 formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9, % 24.49/4.15 formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95, % 24.49/4.15 formula_96, formula_97, formula_98, formula_99 % 24.49/4.15 % 24.49/4.15 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 24.49/4.15 --------------------------------- % 24.49/4.15 % 24.49/4.15 Begin of proof % 24.49/4.15 | % 24.49/4.15 | CLOSE: (formula_101) is inconsistent. % 24.49/4.15 | % 24.49/4.15 End of proof % 24.49/4.15 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 24.49/4.15 % 24.49/4.15 3536ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------