↑ Up

Princess---230619.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SWW821_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:51:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 35.14s 5.71s
% Output   : Proof 45.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWW821_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 22:11:14 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.17/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.17/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.17/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.17/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.17/0.63  
% 0.17/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.17/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.17/0.63  
% 0.17/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.17/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.17/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.17/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.17/0.63  
% 0.17/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.17/0.63  
% 0.17/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.17/0.65  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.17/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 1.91/1.04  Prover 1: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.04  Prover 5: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.04  Prover 2: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.04  Prover 4: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.04  Prover 3: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.05  Prover 0: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 1.91/1.05  Prover 6: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 9.35/2.32  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.32  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.33  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.35  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.37  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 9.35/2.39  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 32.66/5.48  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 32.66/5.62  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.05/5.65  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 35.14/5.68  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.14/5.68  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 35.14/5.68  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 35.14/5.69  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.14/5.70  Prover 0: proved (5040ms)
% 35.14/5.70  
% 35.14/5.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.14/5.71  
% 35.53/5.72  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 35.53/5.72  Prover 6: stopped
% 35.53/5.72  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 35.53/5.73  Prover 3: stopped
% 35.53/5.73  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 35.53/5.74  Prover 7: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 35.53/5.74  Prover 8: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 35.53/5.75  Prover 10: Warning: Problem contains reals, using incomplete axiomatisation
% 36.73/5.89  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 36.73/5.89  Prover 4: Found proof (size 1)
% 36.73/5.89  Prover 4: proved (5228ms)
% 36.73/5.91  Prover 1: stopped
% 38.04/6.35  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 38.04/6.35  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 40.48/6.42  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 40.48/6.42  Prover 5: stopped
% 40.48/6.43  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 43.17/6.77  Prover 10: stopped
% 43.17/6.79  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 43.17/6.79  Prover 2: stopped
% 43.17/6.80  Prover 7: stopped
% 45.14/7.24  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 45.31/7.30  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 45.31/7.32  Prover 8: stopped
% 45.31/7.32  
% 45.31/7.32  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 45.31/7.32  
% 45.31/7.33  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 45.31/7.34  Assumptions after simplification:
% 45.31/7.34  ---------------------------------
% 45.31/7.34  
% 45.31/7.34    (formula_101)
% 45.70/7.34    $false
% 45.70/7.34  
% 45.70/7.34  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 45.70/7.34  --------------------------------------------
% 45.70/7.34  formula_1, formula_10, formula_100, formula_11, formula_12, formula_13,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_14, formula_15, formula_16, formula_17, formula_18, formula_19,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_2, formula_20, formula_21, formula_22, formula_23, formula_24,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_25, formula_26, formula_27, formula_28, formula_29, formula_3,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_30, formula_31, formula_32, formula_33, formula_34, formula_35,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_36, formula_37, formula_38, formula_39, formula_4, formula_40,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_41, formula_42, formula_43, formula_44, formula_45, formula_46,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_47, formula_48, formula_49, formula_5, formula_50, formula_51,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_52, formula_53, formula_54, formula_55, formula_56, formula_57,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_58, formula_59, formula_6, formula_60, formula_61, formula_62,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_63, formula_64, formula_65, formula_66, formula_67, formula_68,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_69, formula_7, formula_70, formula_71, formula_72, formula_73,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_74, formula_75, formula_76, formula_77, formula_78, formula_79,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_8, formula_80, formula_81, formula_82, formula_83, formula_84,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_85, formula_86, formula_87, formula_88, formula_89, formula_9,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_90, formula_91, formula_92, formula_93, formula_94, formula_95,
% 45.70/7.34  formula_96, formula_97, formula_98, formula_99
% 45.70/7.34  
% 45.70/7.34  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 45.70/7.34  ---------------------------------
% 45.70/7.34  
% 45.70/7.34  Begin of proof
% 45.70/7.35  | 
% 45.70/7.35  | CLOSE: (formula_101) is inconsistent.
% 45.70/7.35  | 
% 45.70/7.35  End of proof
% 45.70/7.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 45.70/7.35  
% 45.70/7.35  6712ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------