↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW957+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   67 (  39 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  30   ~;  24   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (   5 sgn  52   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax49,axiom,
    ! [X10] : constr_xor(X10,constr_ZERO) = X10,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax49) ).

fof(ax50,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12] : constr_xor(X11,X12) = constr_xor(X12,X11),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax50) ).

fof(ax51,axiom,
    ! [X13,X14,X15] : constr_xor(X13,constr_xor(X14,X15)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X13,X14),X15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax51) ).

fof(ax48,axiom,
    ! [X9] : constr_xor(X9,X9) = constr_ZERO,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax48) ).

fof(ax74,axiom,
    ! [X40,X41] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_2(X40,X41))
     => pred_attacker(X40) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax74) ).

fof(ax45,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)) = tuple_2(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax45) ).

fof(ax52,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X17)
        & pred_attacker(X16) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_xor(X16,X17)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax52) ).

fof(ax72,axiom,
    ! [X36,X37] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X36,X37))
     => pred_attacker(X37) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax72) ).

fof(ax82,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax82) ).

fof(co0,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(ax81,axiom,
    ! [X50] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X50))
     => pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X50,constr_C(X50)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax81) ).

fof(ax47,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] : constr_C(constr_xor(X7,X8)) = constr_xor(constr_C(X7),constr_C(X8)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax47) ).

fof(ax46,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4,X5,X6] : constr_xor(constr_concat(X3,X5),constr_concat(X4,X6)) = constr_concat(constr_xor(X3,X4),constr_xor(X5,X6)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax46) ).

fof(ax54,axiom,
    ! [X18] :
      ( pred_attacker(X18)
     => pred_attacker(constr_split(X18)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax54) ).

fof(ax58,axiom,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X23,X24))
     => pred_attacker(X24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax58) ).

fof(ax59,axiom,
    ! [X25] :
      ( pred_attacker(X25)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X25)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax59) ).

fof(ax62,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax62) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X60] : constr_xor(X60,constr_ZERO) = X60,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax49]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X61,X62] : constr_xor(X61,X62) = constr_xor(X62,X61),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax50]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X63,X64,X65] : constr_xor(X63,constr_xor(X64,X65)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X63,X64),X65),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax51]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X59] : constr_xor(X59,X59) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax48]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_ZERO) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,X2) = constr_xor(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X90,X91] :
      ( pred_attacker(X90)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(X90,X91)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax74])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X51,X52] : constr_split(constr_concat(X51,X52)) = tuple_2(X51,X52),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax45]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X66,X67] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_xor(X66,X67))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X67)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X66) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax52])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,X1) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    constr_xor(constr_ZERO,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X86,X87] :
      ( pred_attacker(X87)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X86,X87)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax72])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax82]) ).

fof(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X100] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X100,constr_C(X100)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X100)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])])]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X57,X58] : constr_C(constr_xor(X57,X58)) = constr_xor(constr_C(X57),constr_C(X58)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax47]) ).

fof(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X53,X54,X55,X56] : constr_xor(constr_concat(X53,X55),constr_concat(X54,X56)) = constr_concat(constr_xor(X53,X54),constr_xor(X55,X56)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax46]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(X1,X2))
    | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)) = tuple_2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X68] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_split(X68))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X68) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax54])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(X2)
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X1,X2))
    | pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    constr_C(constr_xor(X1,X2)) = constr_xor(constr_C(X1),constr_C(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    constr_xor(constr_concat(X1,X2),constr_concat(X3,X4)) = constr_concat(constr_xor(X1,X3),constr_xor(X2,X4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)))
    | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | pred_attacker(constr_split(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(X2)
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X2,X1))
    | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

fof(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

fof(c_0_51,plain,
    ! [X73,X74] :
      ( pred_attacker(X74)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X73,X74)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax58])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1))))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    constr_C(constr_ZERO) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_44]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    constr_concat(constr_ZERO,constr_ZERO) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_45]),c_0_27]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_concat(X1,X2))
    | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))
    | pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X1,X2))
    | pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]),c_0_54]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).

fof(c_0_62,plain,
    ! [X75] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X75))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X75) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax59])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax62]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWW957+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.44  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:19:50 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.60  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 534264 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.23/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.60  % Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60  % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_100_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 212s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % SubtermCWHack with pid 534271 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.60  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.60  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.60  % Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60  % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.60  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.60  
% 0.23/0.60  % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.60  % Parsed axioms                        : 84
% 0.23/0.60  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Initial clauses                      : 84
% 0.23/0.60  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/0.60  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.23/0.60  % Processed clauses                    : 118
% 0.23/0.60  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.23/0.60  % ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.23/0.60  % ...remaining for further processing  : 102
% 0.23/0.60  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.23/0.60  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Generated clauses                    : 120
% 0.23/0.60  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60
% 0.23/0.60  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Paramodulations                      : 120
% 0.23/0.60  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Total rewrite steps                  : 92
% 0.23/0.60  % ...of those cached                   : 51
% 0.23/0.60  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60  % Current number of processed clauses  : 99
% 0.23/0.60  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.23/0.60  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.60  %    Negative unit clauses             : 49
% 0.23/0.60  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.23/0.60  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.23/0.60  % ...number of literals in the above   : 47
% 0.23/0.60  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.23/0.60  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 406
% 0.23/0.60  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 377
% 0.23/0.60  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.23/0.60  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 416
% 0.23/0.60  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.23/0.60  % BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.23/0.60  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/0.60  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3723
% 0.23/0.60  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 443
% 0.23/0.60  
% 0.23/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.60  % User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.23/0.60  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.60  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.23/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 3708 pages
% 0.23/0.60  
% 0.23/0.60  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.60  % User time                : 0.072 s
% 0.23/0.60  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.23/0.60  % Total time               : 0.090 s
% 0.23/0.60  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.60  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------