%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:13:56 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 22:44:05 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.13/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.13/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.13/0.38 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.13/0.38 # % 0.13/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.13/0.38 # Number of axioms: 83 Number of unprocessed: 83 % 0.13/0.38 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.13/0.38 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.13/0.38 # Hello from C++ % 0.13/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.13/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.13/0.38 # 83 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.13/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.13/0.38 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.13/0.38 # Found 64 unit axioms. % 0.13/0.38 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.13/0.38 # 19 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.13/0.38 # 64 unit axiom clauses % 0.13/0.38 % 0.13/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.13/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.13/0.38 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.13/0.38 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.13/0.40 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.13/0.40 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.40 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.13/0.40 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.13/0.40 % 0.13/0.40 # End clausification derivation % 0.13/0.40 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_1))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_2))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_3))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_CONST_4))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_ZERO))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (pred_attacker(name_c))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_true))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_false))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X1)))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (constr_xor(X1,constr_ZERO)=X1)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (pred_equal(X1,X1))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (constr_xor(X1,X1)=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (constr_xor(constr_C(X1),constr_C(X2))=constr_C(constr_xor(X1,X2)))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (constr_xor(constr_xor(X1,X2),X3)=constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))))))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (constr_xor(constr_concat(X1,X2),constr_concat(X3,X4))=constr_concat(constr_xor(X1,X3),constr_xor(X2,X4)))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (constr_xor(X1,X2)=constr_xor(X2,X1))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (name_objective!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (~pred_attacker(name_objective))). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (name_objective!=name_v)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (constr_CONST_0x30!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (constr_CONST_1!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (constr_CONST_1!=constr_CONST_0x30)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=constr_CONST_0x30)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=constr_CONST_1)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=constr_CONST_0x30)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=constr_CONST_1)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (name_Kab!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_43, plain, (name_c!=name_objective)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=constr_CONST_2)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=constr_CONST_0x30)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=constr_CONST_1)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=constr_CONST_2)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=constr_CONST_3)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (constr_CONST_0x30!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (constr_CONST_1!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (constr_CONST_0x30!=name_Kab)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (constr_CONST_1!=name_Kab)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=name_Kab)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=name_Kab)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=name_Kab)). % 0.13/0.40 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (name_Kab!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (name_c!=constr_CONST_0x30)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (name_c!=constr_CONST_1)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (name_c!=constr_CONST_2)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (name_c!=constr_CONST_3)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (name_c!=constr_CONST_4)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (name_c!=constr_ZERO)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (name_c!=name_Kab)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (constr_CONST_0x30!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (constr_CONST_1!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (constr_CONST_2!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (constr_CONST_3!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (constr_CONST_4!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (constr_ZERO!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (name_Kab!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (name_c!=name_v)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_split(X1))|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_C(X1))|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1))|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X2,X1)))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X1,X2)))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_mess(X2,X1)|~pred_attacker(X2))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(constr_split(constr_concat(X2,X1))))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (pred_attacker(X1)|~pred_attacker(constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2))))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (pred_mess(X1,X2)|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_concat(X1,X2))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X1,X2))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_RC4(X1,X2))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X1,X2))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (pred_attacker(constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)))|~pred_attacker(X2)|~pred_attacker(X1))). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1)))))|~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)))). % 0.20/0.40 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.20/0.40 # Begin printing tableau % 0.20/0.40 # Found 4 steps % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_84, negated_conjecture, (~pred_attacker(name_objective)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_85, plain, (~pred_attacker(name_objective)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_61])). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(name_objective))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_61])). % 0.20/0.40 cnf(i_0_133, plain, (~pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(name_objective)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_133, ...])). % 0.20/0.40 # End printing tableau % 0.20/0.40 # SZS output end % 0.20/0.40 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.20/0.40 # Child (14415) has found a proof. % 0.20/0.40 % 0.20/0.40 # Proof search is over... % 0.20/0.40 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------