↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWW958+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:30:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.32s 11.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :  153 (  46 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  315 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  315 ( 153   ~; 141   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  213 (   0 sgn 213   !;   0   ?; 113   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f191,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : constr_adec(constr_aenc(X1,constr_pkey(X0)),X0) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax190) ).

fof(f192,axiom,
    ! [X0] : constr_add(X0,constr_neg(X0)) = constr_ZERO,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax191) ).

fof(f193,axiom,
    ! [X0] : constr_add(X0,constr_ZERO) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax192) ).

fof(f194,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : constr_add(X0,X1) = constr_add(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax193) ).

fof(f195,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(X1,X2)) = constr_add(constr_add(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax194) ).

fof(f196,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_true),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax195) ).

fof(f197,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(constr_pkey(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax196) ).

fof(f205,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(X0))
     => pred_attacker(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax204) ).

fof(f206,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(constr_neg(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax205) ).

fof(f239,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(X0))
     => pred_attacker(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax238) ).

fof(f242,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(X0,X1))
     => pred_attacker(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax241) ).

fof(f243,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X1)
        & pred_attacker(X0) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax242) ).

fof(f244,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1))
     => pred_attacker(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax243) ).

fof(f246,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax245) ).

fof(f248,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax247) ).

fof(f250,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X1)
        & pred_attacker(X0) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax249) ).

fof(f251,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X1)
        & pred_attacker(X0) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax250) ).

fof(f252,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X1)
        & pred_attacker(X0) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax251) ).

fof(f253,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax252) ).

fof(f268,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(constr_pkey(name_skA))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax267) ).

fof(f272,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X1))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax271) ).

fof(f273,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1,X0)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X0,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax272) ).

fof(f277,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(f278,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f277]) ).

fof(f279,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    inference(flattening,[],[f278]) ).

fof(f281,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_pkey(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f197]) ).

fof(f289,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f205]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_neg(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f206]) ).

fof(f328,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f239]) ).

fof(f332,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(X0,X1))
      | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f242]) ).

fof(f333,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f243]) ).

fof(f334,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f333]) ).

fof(f335,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f244]) ).

fof(f337,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f246]) ).

fof(f339,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f248]) ).

fof(f341,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f250]) ).

fof(f342,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f341]) ).

fof(f343,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f251]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f343]) ).

fof(f345,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f252]) ).

fof(f346,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f345]) ).

fof(f351,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X1))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f272]) ).

fof(f352,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X1))) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f351]) ).

fof(f353,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1,X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X0,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na)))) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f273]) ).

fof(f354,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1,X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X0,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na)))) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f353]) ).

fof(f551,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : constr_adec(constr_aenc(X1,constr_pkey(X0)),X0) = X1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f191]) ).

fof(f552,plain,
    ! [X0] : constr_ZERO = constr_add(X0,constr_neg(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f192]) ).

fof(f553,plain,
    ! [X0] : constr_add(X0,constr_ZERO) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f193]) ).

fof(f554,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : constr_add(X0,X1) = constr_add(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f194]) ).

fof(f555,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(X1,X2)) = constr_add(constr_add(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f195]) ).

fof(f556,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_true),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).

fof(f557,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_pkey(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f281]) ).

fof(f565,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f289]) ).

fof(f566,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_neg(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f290]) ).

fof(f599,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f328]) ).

fof(f602,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(X0,X1))
      | pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f332]) ).

fof(f603,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f334]) ).

fof(f604,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f335]) ).

fof(f606,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f337]) ).

fof(f608,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f339]) ).

fof(f610,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f342]) ).

fof(f611,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f344]) ).

fof(f612,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f346]) ).

fof(f613,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f253]) ).

fof(f627,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(constr_pkey(name_skA))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

fof(f631,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X1))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f352]) ).

fof(f632,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1,X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X0,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f354]) ).

fof(f636,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f279]) ).

tcf(c_239,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_adec(constr_aenc(X0,constr_pkey(X1)),X1) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f551]) ).

tcf(c_240,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_neg(X0)) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f552]) ).

tcf(c_241,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_ZERO) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f553]) ).

tcf(c_242,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(X0,X1) = constr_add(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f554]) ).

tcf(c_243,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : constr_add(constr_add(X0,X1),X2) = constr_add(X0,constr_add(X1,X2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f555]) ).

tcf(c_244,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_true),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f556]) ).

tcf(c_245,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_pkey(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f557]) ).

tcf(c_253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f565]) ).

tcf(c_254,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_neg(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f566]) ).

tcf(c_287,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f599]) ).

tcf(c_290,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f602]) ).

tcf(c_291,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f603]) ).

tcf(c_292,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f604]) ).

tcf(c_294,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f606]) ).

tcf(c_296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f608]) ).

tcf(c_298,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f610]) ).

tcf(c_299,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_adec(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f611]) ).

tcf(c_300,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f612]) ).

tcf(c_301,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f613]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_out_1(constr_pkey(name_skA))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f627]) ).

tcf(c_319,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X1)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f631]) ).

tcf(c_320,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X1,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f632]) ).

tcf(c_324,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f636]) ).

tcf(c_326,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_ZERO) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_296]) ).

tcf(c_340,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_pkey(constr_ZERO))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_ZERO) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_245]) ).

tcf(c_363,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_adec(X1,name_skA),constr_neg(name_Na))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_294,c_292,c_320]) ).

tcf(c_375,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X1,name_skA))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X2))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_363,c_243,c_242]) ).

tcf(c_425,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_294]) ).

tcf(c_806,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0)) ),
    inference(bin_hyper_res,[status(thm)],[c_319,c_425]) ).

tcf(c_1876,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_296]) ).

tcf(c_2250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(bin_hyper_res,[status(thm)],[c_806,c_1876]) ).

tcf(c_3240,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_10
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_2250]) ).

tcf(c_3241,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_11
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[c_2250]) ).

tcf(c_3242,plain,
    ( iPr_def_11
    | iPr_def_10 ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_2250]) ).

tcf(c_3243,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_12
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(X0)) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[c_375]) ).

tcf(c_3244,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_13
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X1,name_skA))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[c_375]) ).

tcf(c_3245,plain,
    ( iPr_def_13
    | iPr_def_12 ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_375]) ).

tcf(c_3246,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Sa),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_324]) ).

tcf(c_3280,plain,
    ( ~ iPr_def_10
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_ZERO) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3240]) ).

tcf(c_3281,plain,
    ( ~ iPr_def_12
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_1(constr_ZERO)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3243]) ).

tcf(c_5894,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_pkey(name_skA)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_315,c_253]) ).

tcf(c_6030,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : constr_add(constr_ZERO,X0) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_241,c_242]) ).

tcf(c_6152,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,constr_pkey(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_239,c_299]) ).

tcf(c_6230,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(constr_neg(X0),X1)) = constr_add(constr_ZERO,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_240,c_243]) ).

tcf(c_6250,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(constr_neg(X0),X1)) = X1,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6230,c_6030]) ).

tcf(c_6253,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : constr_neg(constr_neg(X0)) = constr_add(X0,constr_ZERO),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_240,c_6250]) ).

tcf(c_6255,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(X1,constr_neg(X0))) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_242,c_6250]) ).

tcf(c_6259,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6250,c_300]) ).

tcf(c_6261,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_add(X1,constr_add(constr_neg(constr_add(X0,X1)),X2))) = X2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6250,c_243]) ).

tcf(c_6266,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : constr_neg(constr_neg(X0)) = X0,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6253,c_241]) ).

tcf(c_6277,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_neg(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6266,c_254]) ).

tcf(c_6521,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(X0,constr_neg(constr_add(X0,X1))) = constr_neg(X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6255,c_6261]) ).

tcf(c_6615,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_neg(constr_add(X0,constr_neg(X1))) = constr_add(X1,constr_neg(X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6255,c_6521]) ).

tcf(c_6799,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(constr_neg(X0),constr_neg(X1)) = constr_neg(constr_add(X1,X0)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6266,c_6615]) ).

tcf(c_6842,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : constr_add(constr_neg(X0),constr_neg(X1)) = constr_neg(constr_add(X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_242,c_6799]) ).

tcf(c_6853,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(X0),constr_neg(X1))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6799,c_6277]) ).

tcf(c_7000,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(X0),constr_neg(X1)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6842,c_254]) ).

tcf(c_7191,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_neg(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7000,c_6259]) ).

tcf(c_7195,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(X1,X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7000,c_6853]) ).

tcf(c_7359,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_neg(constr_add(constr_neg(X0),X1)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6250,c_7191]) ).

tcf(c_7773,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,constr_neg(X1)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_7359,c_6266,c_6842]) ).

tcf(c_7794,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(X1),X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_7773,c_7195]) ).

tcf(c_8262,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(constr_neg(X0)),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6250,c_7794]) ).

tcf(c_8290,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8262,c_6266]) ).

tcf(c_8353,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_242,c_8290]) ).

tcf(c_8707,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_6250,c_8353]) ).

tcf(c_9892,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0))) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3241,c_301,c_3280,c_3241,c_3242]) ).

tcf(c_9893,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_3(name_A,constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_9892]) ).

tcf(c_9898,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_aenc(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa),X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9893,c_290]) ).

tcf(c_9907,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_pkey(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9898,c_6152]) ).

tcf(c_9911,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_ZERO)
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_pkey(constr_ZERO)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_9907]) ).

tcf(c_9912,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_add(name_Na,name_Sa)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_9907,c_301,c_340,c_9911]) ).

tcf(c_9917,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(name_Sa)
    | ~ pred_attacker(name_Na) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9912,c_8290]) ).

tcf(c_9925,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_Na),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9917,c_3246]) ).

tcf(c_10296,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X1,name_skA)))) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3244,c_301,c_326,c_3281,c_3244,c_3245]) ).

tcf(c_10297,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X1,name_skA))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_10296]) ).

tcf(c_10302,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X0,name_skA))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_291,c_10297]) ).

tcf(c_10376,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_5(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X0,name_skA))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9912,c_10302]) ).

tcf(c_10387,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(constr_add(constr_neg(name_Na),constr_adec(X0,name_skA)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_10376,c_287]) ).

tcf(c_10411,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( pred_attacker(name_Na)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,name_skA)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_10387,c_8707]) ).

tcf(c_10418,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_adec(X0,name_skA)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10411,c_9925]) ).

tcf(c_10446,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_aenc(X0,constr_pkey(name_skA))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_239,c_10418]) ).

tcf(c_10468,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(constr_pkey(name_skA)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_298,c_10446]) ).

tcf(c_10470,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ pred_attacker(X0),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10468,c_5894]) ).

tcf(c_10471,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_244,c_10470]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW958+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/10.40  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/10.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/10.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/10.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/10.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/10.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/10.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/10.40  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 23:16:00 UTC 2026
% 0.14/10.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.41  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/10.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.46  
% 0.14/10.46  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/10.46  
% 0.14/10.46  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/10.47  % Proving...
% 6.32/11.76  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 6.32/11.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------  iProver source info
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 6.32/11.76  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 6.32/11.76  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Parsing...
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 4 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Proving...
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % 
% 6.32/11.76  % clauses                               278
% 6.32/11.76  % conjectures                           1
% 6.32/11.76  % EPR                                   207
% 6.32/11.76  % Horn                                  276
% 6.32/11.76  % unary                                 214
% 6.32/11.76  % binary                                48
% 6.32/11.76  % lits                                  358
% 6.32/11.76  % lits eq                               195
% 6.32/11.76  % fd_pure                               0
% 6.32/11.76  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 6.32/11.76  % fd_cond                               0
% 6.32/11.76  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 6.32/11.76  % AC symbols                            1
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ 
% 6.32/11.76  % Current options:
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % ------ Proving...
% 6.32/11.76  % 
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.32/11.76  
% 6.32/11.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------