↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SWW961+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:45:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  18 unt;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  122 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  137 (  70   ~;  53   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn  46   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f90,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax89) ).

fof(f115,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
     => pred_attacker(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax114) ).

fof(f121,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax120) ).

fof(f123,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax122) ).

fof(f125,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax124) ).

fof(f152,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax151) ).

fof(f174,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
        & pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
        & pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax173) ).

fof(f177,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(f178,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f177]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(flattening,[],[f178]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f261,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f174]) ).

fof(f262,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f261]) ).

fof(f356,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

fof(f381,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f208]) ).

fof(f387,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).

fof(f389,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f217]) ).

fof(f391,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).

fof(f418,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f152]) ).

fof(f439,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f262]) ).

fof(f442,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f179]) ).

fof(f444,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f446,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f444]) ).

fof(f448,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ! [X2,X0] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f449,plain,
    ( ! [X2,X0] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f448]) ).

fof(f451,definition,
    ( spl0_3
  <=> ! [X1] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB))) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f452,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB))) )
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f451]) ).

fof(f454,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ! [X3] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f455,plain,
    ( ! [X3] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS)))) )
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f454]) ).

fof(f456,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2
    | spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f439,f454,f451,f448,f444]) ).

fof(f457,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f449,f356]) ).

fof(f467,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f387,f457]) ).

fof(f468,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f467,f418]) ).

fof(f518,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f468]) ).

fof(f519,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f452,f356]) ).

fof(f521,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f389,f519]) ).

fof(f522,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f521,f418]) ).

fof(f573,plain,
    ~ spl0_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f522]) ).

fof(f574,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f455,f356]) ).

fof(f576,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f391,f574]) ).

fof(f577,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f576,f418]) ).

fof(f629,plain,
    ~ spl0_4,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f577]) ).

fof(f630,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(name_objective)
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f446,f381]) ).

fof(f631,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f630,f442]) ).

fof(f632,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f631]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2
    | spl0_3
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f456]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f518]) ).

cnf(s41,plain,
    ~ spl0_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f573]) ).

cnf(s61,plain,
    ~ spl0_4,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f629]) ).

cnf(s62,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f632]) ).

cnf(s63,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s61,s41,s21,s62]) ).

fof(f633,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW961+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 14:52:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.09/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.09/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689972)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=1570794580:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689978)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2689972-2689981"...
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689981)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
% 0.09/0.26  % (2689972)Success in time 0.037 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------