%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 6 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax84,axiom,
! [X14,X15] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X14,X15)) = X14,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax84) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
! [X9,X10,X11] : tuple_assoc_pair(X9,tuple_assoc_pair(X10,X11)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X9,X10),X11),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax82) ).
fof(ax144,axiom,
! [X96,X97] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X96,X97))
=> pred_attacker(X97) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax144) ).
fof(co0,conjecture,
! [X131] : pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(X131),name_objective)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
fof(ax157,axiom,
pred_attacker(name_c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax157) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X172,X173] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X172,X173)) = X172,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax84]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X163,X164,X165] : tuple_assoc_pair(X163,tuple_assoc_pair(X164,X165)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X163,X164),X165),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax82]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X170,X171] :
( pred_attacker(X171)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X170,X171)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax144])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,tuple_assoc_pair(X2,X3)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X131] : pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(X131),name_objective)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2))
| pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(esk1_0),name_objective)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
pred_attacker(name_c),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax157]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(esk1_0),name_objective)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
pred_attacker(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:20:34 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 3827155 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3827159 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.45 % Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 177
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 53
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses : 124
% 0.14/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 124
% 0.14/0.45 % Processed clauses : 131
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.14/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 127
% 0.14/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 24
% 0.14/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 18
% 0.14/0.45 % Generated clauses : 33
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24
% 0.14/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Paramodulations : 33
% 0.14/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 25
% 0.14/0.45 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 85
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 78
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.14/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 33
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 42
% 0.14/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 533
% 0.14/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 522
% 0.14/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 28
% 0.14/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 447
% 0.14/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.14/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 19
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4917
% 0.14/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1108
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4100 pages
% 0.14/0.45
% 0.14/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.45 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------