%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:13:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 10 ( 6 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 6 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax83,axiom,
! [X12,X13] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X12,X13)) = X13,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax83) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
! [X9,X10,X11] : tuple_assoc_pair(X9,tuple_assoc_pair(X10,X11)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X9,X10),X11),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax82) ).
fof(ax143,axiom,
! [X94,X95] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X94,X95))
=> pred_attacker(X94) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax143) ).
fof(co0,conjecture,
! [X131] : pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(X131),name_objective)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
fof(ax168,axiom,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_1(name_A,name_I)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax168) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X203,X204] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X203,X204)) = X204,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax83]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X200,X201,X202] : tuple_assoc_pair(X200,tuple_assoc_pair(X201,X202)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X200,X201),X202),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax82]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X211,X212] :
( pred_attacker(X211)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X211,X212)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax143])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,tuple_assoc_pair(X2,X3)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X131] : pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(X131),name_objective)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2))
| pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(esk1_0),name_objective)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_1(name_A,name_I)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax168]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_Nb(esk1_0),name_objective)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
pred_attacker(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:25:22 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % sh5l with pid 2205563 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/0.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.55 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2205571 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.20/0.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.55 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.55 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 177
% 0.20/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9
% 0.20/0.55 % Initial clauses : 168
% 0.20/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 168
% 0.20/0.55 % Processed clauses : 179
% 0.20/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % ...subsumed : 7
% 0.20/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 172
% 0.20/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 55
% 0.20/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.20/0.55 % Generated clauses : 69
% 0.20/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
% 0.20/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Paramodulations : 69
% 0.20/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 36
% 0.20/0.55 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 88
% 0.20/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 78
% 0.20/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
% 0.20/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 54
% 0.20/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 84
% 0.20/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2340
% 0.20/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2145
% 0.20/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 62
% 0.20/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 499
% 0.20/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 28
% 0.20/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 0.20/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7679
% 0.20/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1195
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.20/0.55 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.55 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.20/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4100 pages
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.55 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.55 % Total time : 0.040 s
% 0.20/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.20/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------