↑ Up

ConnectPP---0.7.2.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem  : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:08:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 21.06s 21.37s
% Output   : Proof 21.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  22   ~;  18   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   5 sgn  19   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax79,axiom,
    ! [VAR_X_67,VAR_Y_68] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(VAR_X_67,VAR_Y_68),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax79) ).

fof(ax93,axiom,
    ! [VAR_V_112] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(VAR_V_112))
     => pred_attacker(VAR_V_112) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax93) ).

fof(ax94,axiom,
    ! [VAR_V_115] :
      ( pred_attacker(VAR_V_115)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_V_115)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax94) ).

fof(ax134,axiom,
    ! [VAR_V_280X30] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(VAR_V_280X30)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax134) ).

fof(ax135,axiom,
    ! [VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30))
        & pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30,name_Kbs))) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax135) ).

fof(co0,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(f_80_1,plain,
    ! [VAR_X_67,VAR_Y_68] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(VAR_X_67,VAR_Y_68),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax79]) ).

fof(f_80_2,plain,
    ! [U_50,U_49] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(U_50,U_49),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_80_1]) ).

cnf(f_80_3,plain,
    pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(U_50,U_49),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_80_2]) ).

fof(f_94_1,plain,
    ! [VAR_V_112] :
      ( pred_attacker(VAR_V_112)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(VAR_V_112)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax93]) ).

fof(f_94_2,plain,
    ! [U_65] :
      ( pred_attacker(U_65)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(U_65)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_94_1]) ).

cnf(f_94_3,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(U_65)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(U_65)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_94_2]) ).

fof(f_95_1,plain,
    ! [VAR_V_115] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_V_115))
      | ~ pred_attacker(VAR_V_115) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax94]) ).

fof(f_95_2,plain,
    ! [U_66] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(U_66))
      | ~ pred_attacker(U_66) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_95_1]) ).

cnf(f_95_3,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(U_66))
    | ~ pred_attacker(U_66) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_95_2]) ).

fof(f_135_1,plain,
    ! [VAR_V_280X30] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(VAR_V_280X30)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax134]) ).

fof(f_135_2,plain,
    ! [U_139] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(U_139)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_135_1]) ).

cnf(f_135_3,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(U_139)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_135_2]) ).

fof(f_136_1,plain,
    ! [VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30,name_Kbs))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax135]) ).

fof(f_136_2,plain,
    ! [U_140] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(U_140))
      | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(U_140,name_Kbs))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[f_136_1]) ).

fof(f_136_3,plain,
    ( ! [U_140] :
        ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(U_140))
        | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(U_140,name_Kbs))) )
    | pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[f_136_2]) ).

cnf(f_136_4,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(U_140))
    | ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(U_140,name_Kbs)))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_136_3]) ).

fof(f_139_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(negate,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).

fof(f_139_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(definitional_conversion,[status(esa)],[f_139_1]) ).

cnf(f_139_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[f_139_2]) ).

cnf(t1,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[f_139_3]) ).

cnf(t2,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
    | pred_attacker(name_objective) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[f_94_3]) ).

cnf(t3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).

cnf(t4,plain,
    ( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451),name_Kbs)))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451)))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[f_136_4]) ).

cnf(t5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).

cnf(t6,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451))) ),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[f_95_3]) ).

cnf(t7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).

cnf(t8,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451)),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t6:2)],[f_135_3]) ).

cnf(t9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t6:2]) ).

cnf(t10,plain,
    pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(name_new0x2Dname(U_1451),name_Kbs))),
    inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[f_80_3]) ).

cnf(t11,plain,
    $false,
    inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t4:3]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 06:02:34 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 21.06/21.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 21.06/21.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------