↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:06:49 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 57.99s 58.19s
% Output   : Proof 57.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 10:54:53 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 57.99/58.19  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 57.99/58.19  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #79 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (VAR_X_67 VAR_Y_68 : Iota), pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring VAR_X_67 VAR_Y_68) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #83 (by assumption #[]): Eq (pred_attacker tuple_true) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #93 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (VAR_V_112 : Iota), pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 VAR_V_112) → pred_attacker VAR_V_112) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #94 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (VAR_V_115 : Iota), pred_attacker VAR_V_115 → pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 VAR_V_115)) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #135 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 57.99/58.19    (∀ (VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30 : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19      And
% 57.99/58.19          (pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring name_A
% 57.99/58.19            (constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 (constr_cbc_dec_3 VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30 name_Kbs)))
% 57.99/58.19          (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30)) →
% 57.99/58.19        pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective))
% 57.99/58.19    True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #138 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (pred_attacker name_objective)) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #141 (by clausification #[138]): Eq (pred_attacker name_objective) False
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #145 (by clausification #[93]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 a) → pred_attacker a) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #146 (by clausification #[145]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 a)) False) (Eq (pred_attacker a) True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #216 (by clausification #[135]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19    Eq
% 57.99/58.19      (And (pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring name_A (constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 (constr_cbc_dec_3 a name_Kbs)))
% 57.99/58.19          (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) →
% 57.99/58.19        pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective))
% 57.99/58.19      True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #217 (by clausification #[216]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19    Or
% 57.99/58.19      (Eq
% 57.99/58.19        (And (pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring name_A (constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 (constr_cbc_dec_3 a name_Kbs)))
% 57.99/58.19          (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)))
% 57.99/58.19        False)
% 57.99/58.19      (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #218 (by clausification #[217]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19    Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True)
% 57.99/58.19      (Or (Eq (pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring name_A (constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 (constr_cbc_dec_3 a name_Kbs))) False)
% 57.99/58.19        (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) False))
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #502 (by clausification #[79]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (VAR_Y_68 : Iota), pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring a VAR_Y_68) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #503 (by clausification #[502]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring a a_1) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #504 (by superposition #[503, 218]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19    Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True)
% 57.99/58.19      (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) False))
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #1180 (by clausification #[94]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (pred_attacker a → pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #1181 (by clausification #[1180]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (pred_attacker a) False) (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #1192 (by superposition #[1181, 83]): Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 tuple_true)) True) (Eq False True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #1260 (by clausification #[1192]): Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 tuple_true)) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21860 (by clausification #[504]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 57.99/58.19    Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True) (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_in_1 a)) False)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21861 (by superposition #[21860, 1260]): Or (Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True) (Eq False True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21862 (by clausification #[21861]): Eq (pred_attacker (tuple_client_B_out_2 name_objective)) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21864 (by superposition #[21862, 146]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (pred_attacker name_objective) True)
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21891 (by clausification #[21864]): Eq (pred_attacker name_objective) True
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21892 (by superposition #[21891, 141]): Eq True False
% 57.99/58.19  Clause #21919 (by clausification #[21892]): False
% 57.99/58.19  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------