%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.7
% Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:27:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 1.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 14:49:30 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.18 Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.40 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.40
% 1.35/0.41 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 1 (ax132): pred_attacker(name_A) = true.
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 2 (ax79): pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X, Y) = true.
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 4 (ax94): ifeq(pred_attacker(X), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X)), true) = true.
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 5 (ax93): ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X)), true, pred_attacker(X), true) = true.
% 1.35/0.41 Axiom 6 (ax135): ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X)), true, ifeq(pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X, name_Kbs))), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true) = true.
% 1.35/0.41
% 1.35/0.41 Goal 1 (co0): pred_attacker(name_objective) = true.
% 1.35/0.41 Proof:
% 1.35/0.41 pred_attacker(name_objective)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(true, true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 6 (ax135) R->L }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_A)), true, ifeq(pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A, constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(name_A, name_Kbs))), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 2 (ax79) }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_A)), true, ifeq(true, true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_A)), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_A)), true), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (ax132) R->L }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(pred_attacker(name_A), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_A)), true), true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 4 (ax94) }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(ifeq(true, true, pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 3 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 1.35/0.41 ifeq(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)), true, pred_attacker(name_objective), true)
% 1.35/0.41 = { by axiom 5 (ax93) }
% 1.35/0.41 true
% 1.35/0.41 % SZS output end Proof
% 1.35/0.41
% 1.35/0.41 RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------