%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:30:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.91s 1.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 24 ~; 19 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 0 ?; 8 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f80,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax79) ).
fof(f94,axiom,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X0))
=> pred_attacker(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax93) ).
fof(f95,axiom,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax94) ).
fof(f133,axiom,
pred_attacker(name_A),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax132) ).
fof(f136,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs))) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax135) ).
fof(f139,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
fof(f140,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f139]) ).
fof(f141,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(flattening,[],[f140]) ).
fof(f155,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f156,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f199,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs)))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).
fof(f200,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs)))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f199]) ).
fof(f282,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f296,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f155]) ).
fof(f297,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f156]) ).
fof(f335,plain,
pred_attacker(name_A),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).
fof(f337,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs)))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f200]) ).
fof(f340,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f141]) ).
tcf(c_128,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).
tcf(c_142,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f296]) ).
tcf(c_143,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f297]) ).
tcf(c_181,plain,
pred_attacker(name_A),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f335]) ).
tcf(c_183,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f337]) ).
tcf(c_186,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f340]) ).
tcf(c_245,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_143]) ).
tcf(c_486,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X0,name_Kbs))) ),
inference(bin_hyper_res,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_245]) ).
tcf(c_512,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_486,c_128]) ).
tcf(c_513,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(name_A) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_512]) ).
tcf(c_514,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_512,c_181,c_513]) ).
tcf(c_2025,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_186]) ).
tcf(c_3798,plain,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_514,c_142]) ).
tcf(c_3799,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3798,c_2025]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 23:17:35 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.31 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.07/0.34
% 0.07/0.34 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.34 % Proving...
% 1.91/1.07 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.07 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.91/1.07 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.91/1.07 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Parsing...
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Proving...
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 %
% 1.91/1.07 % clauses 135
% 1.91/1.07 % conjectures 1
% 1.91/1.07 % EPR 78
% 1.91/1.07 % Horn 135
% 1.91/1.07 % unary 93
% 1.91/1.07 % binary 30
% 1.91/1.07 % lits 198
% 1.91/1.07 % lits eq 79
% 1.91/1.07 % fd_pure 0
% 1.91/1.07 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.91/1.07 % fd_cond 0
% 1.91/1.07 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 1.91/1.07 % AC symbols 0
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------
% 1.91/1.07 % Current options:
% 1.91/1.07 % ------
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 %
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % ------ Proving...
% 1.91/1.07 %
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.91/1.07
% 1.91/1.07 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.91/1.08
% 1.91/1.08
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------