↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SWX035+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 09:16:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 285.62s 37.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 285.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   96 (  38   ~;  36   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0 sgn  26   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(id15,axiom,
    ! [Xx1,Xx2,Xx3] :
      ( times_succeeds(Xx1,Xx2,Xx3)
    <=> ( ( Xx3 = '0'
          & Xx1 = '0' )
        | ? [Xx4,Xx5] :
            ( plus_succeeds(Xx2,Xx5,Xx3)
            & times_succeeds(Xx4,Xx2,Xx5)
            & Xx1 = s(Xx4) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',id15) ).

fof(id27,axiom,
    ! [Xx1] :
      ( nat_succeeds(Xx1)
    <=> ( Xx1 = '0'
        | ? [Xx2] :
            ( nat_succeeds(Xx2)
            & Xx1 = s(Xx2) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',id27) ).

fof('(@+)/2',axiom,
    ! [Xx,Xy,Xz] :
      ( nat_succeeds(Xx)
     => ( '@+'(Xx,Xy) = Xz
      <=> plus_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','(@+)/2') ).

fof('(@*)/2',axiom,
    ! [Xx,Xy,Xz] :
      ( ( nat_succeeds(Xy)
        & nat_succeeds(Xx) )
     => ( '@*'(Xx,Xy) = Xz
      <=> times_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','(@*)/2') ).

fof('lemma-(plus:existence)',axiom,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( nat_succeeds(Xx)
     => ? [Xz] : plus_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','lemma-(plus:existence)') ).

fof('lemma-(times:existence)',axiom,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( ( nat_succeeds(Xy)
        & nat_succeeds(Xx) )
     => ? [Xz] : times_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','lemma-(times:existence)') ).

fof('corollary-(times:successor)',conjecture,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( ( nat_succeeds(Xy)
        & nat_succeeds(Xx) )
     => '@*'(s(Xx),Xy) = '@+'(Xy,'@*'(Xx,Xy)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p','corollary-(times:successor)') ).

fof('corollary-(times:successor)_neg',negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Xx,Xy] :
        ( ( nat_succeeds(Xy)
          & nat_succeeds(Xx) )
       => '@*'(s(Xx),Xy) = '@+'(Xy,'@*'(Xx,Xy)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],['corollary-(times:successor)']) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( ~ plus_succeeds(B,E,C)
    | ~ times_succeeds(D,B,E)
    | s(D) != A
    | times_succeeds(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[id15]) ).

cnf(c_194,plain,
    ( ~ nat_succeeds(B)
    | s(B) != A
    | nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[id27]) ).

cnf(c_208,plain,
    ( ~ plus_succeeds(A,B,C)
    | '@+'(A,B) = C
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['(@+)/2']) ).

cnf(c_210,plain,
    ( ~ times_succeeds(A,B,C)
    | '@*'(A,B) = C
    | ~ nat_succeeds(B)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],['(@*)/2']) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( ? [Xz] : plus_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz)
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xx) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['lemma-(plus:existence)']) ).

fof('sk_lemma-(plus:existence)',plain,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( plus_succeeds(Xx,Xy,sK0(Xx,Xy))
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xx) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(Xz,sK0(Xx,Xy))],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_222,plain,
    ( plus_succeeds(A,B,sK0(A,B))
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['sk_lemma-(plus:existence)']) ).

fof(nnf_57,plain,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( ? [Xz] : times_succeeds(Xx,Xy,Xz)
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xy)
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xx) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['lemma-(times:existence)']) ).

fof('sk_lemma-(times:existence)',plain,
    ! [Xx,Xy] :
      ( times_succeeds(Xx,Xy,sK1(Xx,Xy))
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xy)
      | ~ nat_succeeds(Xx) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(Xz,sK1(Xx,Xy))],[nnf_57]) ).

cnf(c_237,plain,
    ( times_succeeds(A,B,sK1(A,B))
    | ~ nat_succeeds(B)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['sk_lemma-(times:existence)']) ).

fof(nnf_61,plain,
    ? [Xx,Xy] :
      ( '@*'(s(Xx),Xy) != '@+'(Xy,'@*'(Xx,Xy))
      & nat_succeeds(Xy)
      & nat_succeeds(Xx) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],['corollary-(times:successor)_neg']) ).

fof('sk_corollary-(times:successor)_neg',plain,
    ( '@*'(s(sK2),sK3) != '@+'(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3))
    & nat_succeeds(sK3)
    & nat_succeeds(sK2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(Xx,sK2),skolemize(Xy,sK3)],[nnf_61]) ).

cnf(c_245,negated_conjecture,
    nat_succeeds(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['sk_corollary-(times:successor)_neg']) ).

cnf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    nat_succeeds(sK3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['sk_corollary-(times:successor)_neg']) ).

cnf(c_247,negated_conjecture,
    '@*'(s(sK2),sK3) != '@+'(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],['sk_corollary-(times:successor)_neg']) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    ( ~ plus_succeeds(B,D,C)
    | ~ times_succeeds(A,B,D)
    | times_succeeds(s(A),B,C) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_421,plain,
    ( ~ nat_succeeds(A)
    | nat_succeeds(s(A)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_194]) ).

cnf(c_452,plain,
    ( times_succeeds(sK2,A,sK1(sK2,A))
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_245,c_237]) ).

cnf(c_520,plain,
    plus_succeeds(sK3,A,sK0(sK3,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_222]) ).

cnf(c_527,plain,
    ( ~ times_succeeds(A,sK3,B)
    | '@*'(A,sK3) = B
    | ~ nat_succeeds(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_210]) ).

cnf(c_962,plain,
    nat_succeeds(s(sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_421,c_245]) ).

cnf(c_22050,plain,
    ( '@+'(sK3,A) = sK0(sK3,A)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_520,c_208]) ).

cnf(c_22051,plain,
    ( sK0(sK3,A) = '@+'(sK3,A)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK3) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_22050]) ).

cnf(c_1578,negated_conjecture,
    sK0(sK3,A) = '@+'(sK3,A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_22051]) ).

cnf(c_1591,plain,
    plus_succeeds(sK3,A,'@+'(sK3,A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_1578,c_520]) ).

cnf(c_2404,plain,
    times_succeeds(sK2,sK3,sK1(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_452,c_246]) ).

cnf(c_22052,plain,
    ( '@*'(sK2,sK3) = sK1(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK3)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2404,c_210]) ).

cnf(c_22053,plain,
    ( sK1(sK2,sK3) = '@*'(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK3)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK2) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_22052]) ).

cnf(c_22054,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1(sK2,sK3) = '@*'(sK2,sK3)
    | ~ nat_succeeds(sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_245,c_22053]) ).

cnf(c_2527,negated_conjecture,
    sK1(sK2,sK3) = '@*'(sK2,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_22054]) ).

cnf(c_2539,plain,
    times_succeeds(sK2,sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_2527,c_2404]) ).

cnf(c_10603,plain,
    ( ~ plus_succeeds(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3),A)
    | times_succeeds(s(sK2),sK3,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_2539]) ).

cnf(c_10616,plain,
    times_succeeds(s(sK2),sK3,'@+'(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10603,c_1591]) ).

cnf(c_22055,plain,
    ( '@*'(s(sK2),sK3) = '@+'(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3))
    | ~ nat_succeeds(s(sK2)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10616,c_527]) ).

cnf(c_22056,plain,
    '@*'(s(sK2),sK3) = '@+'(sK3,'@*'(sK2,sK3)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_962,c_22055]) ).

cnf(c_22049,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_247,c_22056]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SWX035+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 16:49:28 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.13/0.40  % Process 2239873 was started by sandbox2 on n001,
% 0.13/0.40  % Sat Sep 26 16:49:28 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #500 (T,wt=17): 1578 f31(c5,A) = @+(c5,A).  [resolve(520,a,208,c),flip(b),unit_del(a,246)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #1000 (T,wt=19): 4212 plus_succeeds(0,A,s(c4)) | s(c4) != A.  [resolve(1268,b,311,a),flip(b)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #1500 (W,wt=21): 8572 times_succeeds(@*(c4,c4),0,0) | @*(c4,c4) != 0.  [resolve(2024,b,287,a),flip(b)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #2000 (W,wt=14): 11042 c5 = 0 | @<_succeeds(A,c5) | 0 != A.  [resolve(535,a,173,c)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #2500 (F,wt=23): 14200 -nat_fails(@+(c4,@+(c5,c5))).  [resolve(1364,a,75,a)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #3000 (T,wt=23): 7243 times_terminates(c5,@+(c5,@*(c4,c5)),A).  [resolve(2549,a,507,a)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #3500 (T,wt=23): 17927 plus_fails(c5,A,f28(c5)) | plus_succeeds(s(c5),A,c5) | c5 = 0.  [resolve(10674,a,535,a)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #4000 (T,wt=24): 4042 times_terminates(s(@+(c5,c5)),@*(c5,c4),A).  [resolve(959,a,2319,a)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % given #4500 (T,wt=24): 10345 plus_terminates(A,B,@+(@*(c5,c4),s(c4))).  [resolve(8084,a,214,a)].
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % Proof 1 at 4.00 (+ 0.92) seconds.
% 285.62/37.84  % Length of proof is 30.
% 285.62/37.84  % Level of proof is 8.
% 285.62/37.84  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 285.62/37.84  % Given clauses 4518.
% 285.62/37.84  
% 285.62/37.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------