↑ Up

SPASS+T---2.2.22.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Apr  6 10:09:27 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.83s 1.14s
% Output   : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Apr  6 03:15:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  % Using integer theory
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_4155_n006.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SMT.
% 0.83/1.14  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_4155_n006.cluster.edu 
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS derived 494 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses and kept 305 clauses.
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS backtracked 1 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS allocated 6668 KBytes.
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.83/1.14  		0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 0.83/1.14  		
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_4155_n006.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 36 :
% 0.83/1.14  1[0:Inp] ||  -> general(c__supremum__)*.
% 0.83/1.14  2[0:Inp] ||  -> general(c__infimum__)*.
% 0.83/1.14  3[0:Inp] ||  -> symbol(skc7)*.
% 0.83/1.14  5[0:Inp] ||  -> general(skc5)*.
% 0.83/1.14  6[0:Inp] ||  -> general(skc4)*.
% 0.83/1.14  7[0:Inp] ||  -> symbol(skf3(U))*.
% 0.83/1.14  8[0:Inp] ||  -> general(f__integer__(U))*.
% 0.83/1.14  9[0:Inp] ||  -> p__less__(c__infimum__,f__integer__(U))*.
% 0.83/1.14  11[0:Inp] || symbol(U) -> general(f__symbolic__(U))*.
% 0.83/1.14  12[0:Inp] || hp(U) -> SkP0(V,U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  15[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(U,V) SkP0(V,U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  16[0:Inp] || symbol(U) -> p__less__(f__symbolic__(U),c__supremum__)*.
% 0.83/1.14  17[0:Inp] || tp(skc5) SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> .
% 0.83/1.14  20[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc4,skc5)* -> equal(skc5,skc4).
% 0.83/1.14  21[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(U,V)* p__less__(U,f__integer__(5))*.
% 0.83/1.14  22[0:Inp] ||  -> SkP0(U,V)* p__greater__(U,f__integer__(3))*.
% 0.83/1.14  24[0:Inp] || symbol(U) -> p__less__(f__integer__(V),f__symbolic__(U))*.
% 0.83/1.14  25[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> p__less__(skc4,f__integer__(5))*.
% 0.83/1.14  26[0:Inp] || SkP0(skc4,skc5) -> p__greater__(skc4,f__integer__(3))*.
% 0.83/1.14  28[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 0.83/1.14  29[0:Inp] || equal(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))* -> equal(U,V).
% 0.83/1.14  30[0:Inp] || equal(U,V) -> equal(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 0.83/1.14  31[0:Inp] || general(U) equal(U,f__integer__(4))*+ -> tp(U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  32[0:Inp] || general(U) equal(U,f__integer__(4))*+ -> hp(U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  33[0:Inp] || general(U) equal(U,f__integer__(V))*+ -> p__is_integer__(U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  34[0:Inp] || general(U) p__is_symbolic__(U) -> equal(f__symbolic__(skf3(U)),U)**.
% 0.83/1.14  35[0:Inp] || general(U) p__is_integer__(U) -> equal(f__integer__(skf2(U)),U)**.
% 0.83/1.14  36[0:Inp] || general(U)+ general(V) -> p__less_equal__(U,V)* p__less_equal__(V,U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  37(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__greater__(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(V,U)*.
% 0.83/1.14  40(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less__(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(U,V)*.
% 0.83/1.14  41[0:Inp] || general(U) -> p__is_integer__(U) p__is_symbolic__(U)* equal(U,c__infimum__) equal(U,c__supremum__).
% 0.83/1.14  43(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__greater__(U,V)* equal(U,V) -> .
% 0.83/1.14  44(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less__(U,V)* equal(U,V) -> .
% 0.83/1.14  49(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(U,V)* p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> equal(U,V).
% 0.83/1.14  50(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) general(W) p__less_equal__(U,V)* p__less_equal__(V,W)* -> p__less_equal__(U,W)*.
% 0.83/1.14  764(e)[0:ThR:50,49,44,43,41,40,37,36,35,34,33,32,31,30,29,28,26,25,24,22,21,20,17,16,15,12,11,9,8,7,6,5,3,2,1] ||  -> .
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_4155_n006.cluster.edu
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  Formulae used in the proof : fof_sup_type fof_inf_type fof_general_type fof_formula_2_left_0 fof_p__is_symbolic__def_ax fof_symbol_type fof_f__integer___decl fof_f__symbolic___decl fof_maximal_element_ax fof_formula_0_transition_axiom_0 fof_numerals_less_than_symbols_ax fof_numeral_ordering_ax fof_f__integer__def_ax fof_formula_1_right_0 fof_p__is_integer__def_ax fof_strongly_connected_ordering_ax fof_p__greater_equal__def_ax fof_p__less__def_ax fof_p__greater__def_ax fof_antisymmetric_ordering_ax
% 0.83/1.14  
% 0.83/1.14  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------