%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Apr 6 10:09:27 AM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 0.92s 1.23s % Output : Refutation 0.92s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Apr 6 02:51:04 EDT 2025 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.48 % Using integer theory % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_19859_n029.cluster.edu % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.92/1.23 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.92/1.23 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_19859_n029.cluster.edu % 0.92/1.23 SPASS derived 320 clauses, backtracked 80 clauses and kept 361 clauses. % 0.92/1.23 SPASS backtracked 4 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.92/1.23 SPASS allocated 6548 KBytes. % 0.92/1.23 SPASS spent 0:00:00.06 on the problem. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.03 for the reduction. % 0.92/1.23 0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_19859_n029.cluster.edu % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 7 : % 0.92/1.23 6[0:Inp] || -> general(skc4)*. % 0.92/1.23 7[0:Inp] || -> in_cover(skc4)*. % 0.92/1.23 14[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(1,skf9(U))*. % 0.92/1.23 25[0:Inp] || general(U) in_cover(U) -> lesseq(skf9(U),n_i)*. % 0.92/1.23 29(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) in_cover(U) -> equal(f__integer__(skf9(U)),U)**. % 0.92/1.23 49[0:Inp] || in_cover(skc4) lesseq(U,n_i)* lesseq(1,U) equal(f__integer__(U),skc4) -> . % 0.92/1.23 548(e)[0:ThR:49,29,25,14,7,6] || -> . % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_19859_n029.cluster.edu % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 Formulae used in the proof : fof_general_type fof_formula_8_completed_definition_of_in_cover_1 fof_f__integer__def_ax fof_p__is_integer__def_ax fof_p__less__def_ax % 0.92/1.23 % 0.92/1.23 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------