%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS+T---2.2.22 % Problem : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Apr 6 10:09:27 AM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 0.89s 1.18s % Output : Refutation 0.89s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : spasst-tptp-script %s %d % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Apr 6 02:51:09 EDT 2025 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.49 % Using integer theory % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_2564_n023.cluster.edu % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 SPASS V 2.2.22 in combination with yices. % 0.89/1.18 SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT. % 0.89/1.18 Problem: /tmp/SPASST_2564_n023.cluster.edu % 0.89/1.18 SPASS derived 266 clauses, backtracked 79 clauses and kept 347 clauses. % 0.89/1.18 SPASS backtracked 4 times (1 times due to theory inconsistency). % 0.89/1.18 SPASS allocated 6503 KBytes. % 0.89/1.18 SPASS spent 0:00:00.06 on the problem. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.00 for the input. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.01 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.03 for the reduction. % 0.89/1.18 0:00:00.01 for interacting with the SMT procedure. % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_2564_n023.cluster.edu % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % Here is a proof with depth 0, length 7 : % 0.89/1.18 6[0:Inp] || -> general(skc3)*. % 0.89/1.18 7[0:Inp] || -> in_cover(skc3)*. % 0.89/1.18 12[0:Inp] || -> lesseq(1,skf9(U))*. % 0.89/1.18 23[0:Inp] || general(U) in_cover(U) -> lesseq(skf9(U),n_i)*. % 0.89/1.18 26(e)[0:Inp] || general(U) in_cover(U) -> equal(f__integer__(skf9(U)),U)**. % 0.89/1.18 37[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,n_i)* greatereq(U,1) equal(f__integer__(U),skc3) -> . % 0.89/1.18 459(e)[0:ThR:37,26,23,12,7,6] || -> . % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_2564_n023.cluster.edu % 0.89/1.18 % 0.89/1.18 Formulae used in the proof : fof_general_type fof_formula_6_unnamed_formula fof_f__integer___decl fof_f__integer__def_ax fof_p__is_integer__def_ax fof_p__is_symbolic__def_ax fof_symbol_type % 0.89/1.19 % 0.89/1.19 SPASS+T ended %------------------------------------------------------------------------------