↑ Up

SPASS+T---2.2.22.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS+T---2.2.22
% Problem  : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Apr  6 10:09:27 AM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 27.23s 14.89s
% Output   : Refutation 27.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWX000_1 : TPTP v9.1.0. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : spasst-tptp-script %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Apr  6 03:05:18 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  % Using integer theory
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  % SZS status Theorem for /tmp/SPASST_15951_n011.cluster.edu
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS V 2.2.22  in combination with yices.
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS beiseite: Proof found by SPASS and SMT.
% 27.23/14.89  Problem: /tmp/SPASST_15951_n011.cluster.edu 
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS derived 22267 clauses, backtracked 339 clauses and kept 7052 clauses.
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS backtracked 6 times (4 times due to theory inconsistency).
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS allocated 32153 KBytes.
% 27.23/14.89  SPASS spent	0:00:13.76 on the problem.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:00.00 for the input.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:00.49 for inferences.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:00.70 for the backtracking.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:10.98 for the reduction.
% 27.23/14.89  		0:00:00.36 for interacting with the SMT procedure.
% 27.23/14.89  		
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_15951_n011.cluster.edu
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  % Here is a proof with depth 4, length 45 :
% 27.23/14.89  6[0:Inp] ||  -> general(f__integer__(U))*.
% 27.23/14.89  8[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(skc6,0)*.
% 27.23/14.89  14[0:Inp] || lesseq(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 27.23/14.89  16[0:Inp] || equal(U,V) -> equal(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 27.23/14.89  21[0:Inp] || div_p(f__integer__(plus(skc7,1)),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  23[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__greater_equal__(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(V,U)*.
% 27.23/14.89  24[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> p__greater_equal__(U,V).
% 27.23/14.89  25[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less__(U,V) -> p__less_equal__(U,V)*.
% 27.23/14.89  28[0:Inp] || greater(skc6,0) -> div_p(f__integer__(skc7),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(skc9),f__integer__(skc8))*.
% 27.23/14.89  30[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less__(U,V)* equal(U,V) -> .
% 27.23/14.89  35[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(U,V)*+ p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> equal(U,V).
% 27.23/14.89  38[0:Inp] || general(U) general(V) general(W) general(X) div_p(U,V,W,X)* -> p__less__(X,V).
% 27.23/14.89  40[0:Inp] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(W,plus(X,1))* equal(Y,minus(Z,1)) div_p(f__integer__(X),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(V),f__integer__(Y))* -> div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(U),f__integer__(0))*.
% 27.23/14.89  44[0:Inp] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(W,plus(X,1))* less(V,minus(Y,1)) div_p(f__integer__(X),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(V))* -> div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(U))*.
% 27.23/14.89  79[0:ArS:8.0] ||  -> less(0,skc6)*.
% 27.23/14.89  81[0:TOC:14.0] ||  -> less(U,V) p__less_equal__(f__integer__(V),f__integer__(U))*.
% 27.23/14.89  82[0:ArS:28.0] || less(0,skc6) -> div_p(f__integer__(skc7),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(skc9),f__integer__(skc8))*.
% 27.23/14.89  83(e)[0:TOC:82.0] ||  -> lesseq(skc6,0) div_p(f__integer__(skc7),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(skc9),f__integer__(skc8))*.
% 27.23/14.89  84[0:ArS:40.2] || equal(U,plus(V,-1)) equal(W,plus(X,1))* equal(Y,plus(Z,1))* div_p(f__integer__(X),f__integer__(V),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(U))*+ -> div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(V),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(0))*.
% 27.23/14.89  85[0:ArS:44.2] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(W,plus(X,1))* less(V,plus(Y,-1)) div_p(f__integer__(X),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(V))* -> div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(U))*.
% 27.23/14.89  86[0:TOC:85.2] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(W,plus(X,1))* div_p(f__integer__(V),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(X))*+ -> lesseq(plus(Y,-1),X) div_p(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(Y),f__integer__(Z),f__integer__(W))*.
% 27.23/14.89  88[0:Res:84.4,21.0] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(W,1)) equal(X,plus(skc6,-1)) div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(V),f__integer__(X))* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  89[0:Res:86.4,21.0] || equal(U,plus(V,1))* equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(W,1)) div_p(f__integer__(W),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(X),f__integer__(V))* -> lesseq(plus(skc6,-1),V).
% 27.23/14.89  91[0:AED:89.0] || equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(U,1)) div_p(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(V),f__integer__(W))* -> lesseq(plus(skc6,-1),W).
% 27.23/14.89  92[0:AED:88.0] || equal(U,plus(skc6,-1)) equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(V,1)) div_p(f__integer__(V),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(W),f__integer__(U))* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  94[1:Spt:83.0] ||  -> lesseq(skc6,0)*.
% 27.23/14.89  97(e)[1:OCE:79.0,94.0] ||  -> .
% 27.23/14.89  100[1:Spt:97.0,83.0,94.0] || lesseq(skc6,0)* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  101[1:Spt:97.0,83.1] ||  -> div_p(f__integer__(skc7),f__integer__(skc6),f__integer__(skc9),f__integer__(skc8))*.
% 27.23/14.89  249[0:Res:81.1,24.2] || general(f__integer__(U)) general(f__integer__(V)) -> less(U,V) p__greater_equal__(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 27.23/14.89  266[0:MRR:249.0,249.1,6.0,6.0] ||  -> less(U,V) p__greater_equal__(f__integer__(U),f__integer__(V))*.
% 27.23/14.89  698[0:Res:25.3,35.2] || general(U) general(V) p__less__(U,V) general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> equal(U,V).
% 27.23/14.89  710[0:Obv:698.1] || p__less__(U,V) general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> equal(U,V).
% 27.23/14.89  711[0:MRR:710.4,30.3] || p__less__(U,V) general(U) general(V) p__less_equal__(V,U)* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  2790[0:Res:23.3,711.3] || general(U) general(V) p__greater_equal__(U,V) p__less__(U,V)* general(U) general(V) -> .
% 27.23/14.89  2805[0:Obv:2790.1] || p__greater_equal__(U,V) p__less__(U,V)* general(U) general(V) -> .
% 27.23/14.89  16627[1:SpR:16.1,101.0] || equal(skc6,U) -> div_p(f__integer__(skc7),f__integer__(U),f__integer__(skc9),f__integer__(skc8))*.
% 27.23/14.89  16657[1:Res:101.0,38.4] || general(f__integer__(skc7)) general(f__integer__(skc6)) general(f__integer__(skc9)) general(f__integer__(skc8)) -> p__less__(f__integer__(skc8),f__integer__(skc6))*.
% 27.23/14.89  16660[1:MRR:16657.0,16657.1,16657.2,16657.3,6.0,6.0,6.0,6.0] ||  -> p__less__(f__integer__(skc8),f__integer__(skc6))*.
% 27.23/14.89  16692[1:Res:16660.0,2805.1] || p__greater_equal__(f__integer__(skc8),f__integer__(skc6))* general(f__integer__(skc8)) general(f__integer__(skc6)) -> .
% 27.23/14.89  16708[1:MRR:16692.1,16692.2,6.0,6.0] || p__greater_equal__(f__integer__(skc8),f__integer__(skc6))* -> .
% 27.23/14.89  25349[1:Res:266.1,16708.0] ||  -> less(skc8,skc6)*.
% 27.23/14.89  26932[1:Res:16627.1,91.1] || equal(skc6,skc6) equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(skc7,1)) -> lesseq(plus(skc6,-1),skc8)*.
% 27.23/14.89  26934[1:Res:16627.1,92.2] || equal(skc6,skc6) equal(plus(skc6,-1),skc8)** equal(plus(skc7,1),plus(skc7,1)) -> .
% 27.23/14.89  31939[1:ThR:26932,26934,25349] ||  -> .
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for /tmp/SPASST_15951_n011.cluster.edu
% 27.23/14.89  
% 27.23/14.89  Formulae used in the proof : fof_p__is_symbolic__def_ax fof_symbol_type fof_formula_3_inductive_step fof_numeral_ordering_ax fof_f__integer__def_ax fof_strongly_connected_ordering_ax fof_p__greater__def_ax fof_p__greater_equal__def_ax fof_p__less__def_ax fof_formula_0_completed_definition_of_div_4
% 27.86/15.56  
% 27.86/15.56  SPASS+T ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------