↑ Up

Prover9---1109a.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SWX185+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr 29 02:38:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.03s 2.31s
% Output   : Refutation 2.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX185+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Apr 28 23:26:31 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.76/1.04  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.76/1.04  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.76/1.04  Process 30783 was started by sandbox on n004.cluster.edu,
% 0.76/1.04  Tue Apr 28 23:26:32 2026
% 0.76/1.04  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30630_n004.cluster.edu".
% 0.76/1.04  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30630_n004.cluster.edu
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.76/1.04  set(auto2).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.76/1.04      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.76/1.04      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.76/1.04      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.04  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.76/1.04  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.76/1.04  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.76/1.04  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.76/1.04  clear(print_given).
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (41 formulas)
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.76/1.04  
% 0.76/1.04  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.76/1.04  1 (all X all X2 head(cons(X,X2)) = X) # label(axiom_001) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  2 (all X all X2 tail(cons(X,X2)) = X2) # label(axiom_002) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  3 (all X all X2 nil != cons(X,X2)) # label(axiom_003) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  4 (all X all X2 proj1(z(X,X2)) = X) # label(axiom_019) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  5 (all X all X2 proj2(z(X,X2)) = X2) # label(axiom_020) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  6 (all X all X2 proj12(x2(X,X2)) = X) # label(axiom_021) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  7 (all X all X2 proj22(x2(X,X2)) = X2) # label(axiom_022) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  8 (all X all X2 all X3 all X4 z(X,X2) != x2(X3,X4)) # label(axiom_023) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  9 (all X all X2 z(X,X2) != eX) # label(axiom_024) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  10 (all X all X2 z(X,X2) != eY) # label(axiom_025) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  11 (all X all X2 x2(X,X2) != eX) # label(axiom_026) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  12 (all X all X2 x2(X,X2) != eY) # label(axiom_027) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  13 (all X (X != z(proj1(X),proj2(X)) -> (X != x2(proj12(X),proj22(X)) -> assoc(X) = X))) # label(axiom_029) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  14 (all Y all C (Y != z(proj1(Y),proj2(Y)) -> assoc(z(Y,C)) = z(assoc(Y),assoc(C)))) # label(axiom_030) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  15 (all C all A all B assoc(z(z(A,B),C)) = assoc(z(A,z(B,C)))) # label(axiom_031) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  16 (all A2 all B2 assoc(x2(A2,B2)) = x2(assoc(A2),assoc(B2))) # label(axiom_032) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  17 (all Y append(nil,Y) = Y) # label(axiom_033) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.76/1.04  18 (all Y all Z all Xs append(cons(Z,Xs),Y) = cons(Z,append(Xs,Y))) # label(axiom_034) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  19 (all X (X != x2(proj12(X),proj22(X)) -> linTerm(X) = lin(X))) # label(axiom_035) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  20 (all A all B linTerm(x2(A,B)) = append(cons(c,nil),append(lin(z(A,B)),cons(d,nil)))) # label(axiom_036) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  21 (all A all B lin(z(A,B)) = append(linTerm(A),append(cons(plus,nil),linTerm(B)))) # label(axiom_037) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  22 (all A3 all B2 lin(x2(A3,B2)) = append(lin(A3),append(cons(mul,nil),lin(B2)))) # label(axiom_038) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  23 -(exists U exists V -(lin(U) = lin(V) -> assoc(U) = assoc(V))) # label(goal_041) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Term ordering decisions:
% 2.03/2.31  Function symbol KB weights:  nil=1. c=1. d=1. eX=1. eY=1. mul=1. plus=1. x=1. y=1. z=1. cons=1. append=1. x2=1. assoc=1. lin=1. linTerm=1. proj1=1. proj12=1. proj2=1. proj22=1. head=1. tail=1.
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  % Starting search at 0.02 seconds.
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=66.000, iters=3763
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=63.000, iters=3756
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=60.000, iters=3756
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=57.000, iters=3750
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=54.000, iters=3744
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=51.000, iters=3695
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=48.000, iters=3675
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=45.000, iters=3624
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=42.000, iters=3515
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=38.000, iters=3366
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=37.000, iters=3349
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=36.000, iters=3570
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=34.000, iters=3431
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=33.000, iters=3346
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=32.000, iters=3450
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=31.000, iters=3364
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3389
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=28.000, iters=3346
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  NOTE: Back_subsumption disabled, ratio of kept to back_subsumed is 107 (0.00 of 0.76 sec).
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=27.000, iters=3396
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3357
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3342
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=24.000, iters=3334
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3336
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 2.03/2.31  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.03/2.31  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  % Proof 1 at 1.25 (+ 0.04) seconds.
% 2.03/2.31  % Length of proof is 31.
% 2.03/2.31  % Level of proof is 7.
% 2.03/2.31  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 2.03/2.31  % Given clauses 858.
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  6 (all X all X2 proj12(x2(X,X2)) = X) # label(axiom_021) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  9 (all X all X2 z(X,X2) != eX) # label(axiom_024) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  11 (all X all X2 x2(X,X2) != eX) # label(axiom_026) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  13 (all X (X != z(proj1(X),proj2(X)) -> (X != x2(proj12(X),proj22(X)) -> assoc(X) = X))) # label(axiom_029) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  16 (all A2 all B2 assoc(x2(A2,B2)) = x2(assoc(A2),assoc(B2))) # label(axiom_032) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  17 (all Y append(nil,Y) = Y) # label(axiom_033) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  18 (all Y all Z all Xs append(cons(Z,Xs),Y) = cons(Z,append(Xs,Y))) # label(axiom_034) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  22 (all A3 all B2 lin(x2(A3,B2)) = append(lin(A3),append(cons(mul,nil),lin(B2)))) # label(axiom_038) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  23 -(exists U exists V -(lin(U) = lin(V) -> assoc(U) = assoc(V))) # label(goal_041) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  24 append(nil,A) = A # label(axiom_033) # label(axiom).  [clausify(17)].
% 2.03/2.31  29 proj12(x2(A,B)) = A # label(axiom_021) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 2.03/2.31  31 lin(eX) = cons(x,nil) # label(axiom_039) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 2.03/2.31  32 cons(x,nil) = lin(eX).  [copy(31),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  35 assoc(x2(A,B)) = x2(assoc(A),assoc(B)) # label(axiom_032) # label(axiom).  [clausify(16)].
% 2.03/2.31  36 x2(assoc(A),assoc(B)) = assoc(x2(A,B)).  [copy(35),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  37 append(cons(A,B),C) = cons(A,append(B,C)) # label(axiom_034) # label(axiom).  [clausify(18)].
% 2.03/2.31  43 lin(x2(A,B)) = append(lin(A),append(cons(mul,nil),lin(B))) # label(axiom_038) # label(axiom).  [clausify(22)].
% 2.03/2.31  44 append(lin(A),cons(mul,lin(B))) = lin(x2(A,B)).  [copy(43),rewrite([37(8),24(7)]),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  49 z(proj1(A),proj2(A)) = A | x2(proj12(A),proj22(A)) = A | assoc(A) = A # label(axiom_029) # label(axiom).  [clausify(13)].
% 2.03/2.31  78 z(A,B) != eX # label(axiom_024) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 2.03/2.31  80 x2(A,B) != eX # label(axiom_026) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 2.03/2.31  83 lin(A) != lin(B) | assoc(A) = assoc(B) # label(goal_041) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(23)].
% 2.03/2.31  88 proj12(assoc(x2(A,B))) = assoc(A).  [para(36(a,1),29(a,1,1))].
% 2.03/2.31  90 append(lin(eX),A) = cons(x,A).  [para(32(a,1),37(a,1,1)),rewrite([24(6)])].
% 2.03/2.31  125 assoc(eX) = eX.  [resolve(80,a,49,b),unit_del(a,78)].
% 2.03/2.31  150 assoc(x2(eX,A)) = x2(eX,assoc(A)).  [para(125(a,1),36(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  199 cons(x,cons(mul,lin(A))) = lin(x2(eX,A)).  [para(90(a,1),44(a,1))].
% 2.03/2.31  673 cons(x,cons(mul,append(lin(A),B))) = append(lin(x2(eX,A)),B).  [para(199(a,1),37(a,1,1)),rewrite([37(9)]),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  7222 lin(x2(x2(eX,A),B)) = lin(x2(eX,x2(A,B))).  [para(44(a,1),673(a,1,2,2)),rewrite([199(6),44(11)]),flip(a)].
% 2.03/2.31  7256 assoc(x2(x2(eX,A),B)) = x2(eX,assoc(x2(A,B))).  [resolve(7222,a,83,a),rewrite([150(8)])].
% 2.03/2.31  7438 $F.  [para(7256(a,1),88(a,1,1)),rewrite([29(5),150(4)]),flip(a),unit_del(a,80)].
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Given=858. Generated=54497. Kept=7395. proofs=1.
% 2.03/2.31  Usable=828. Sos=6163. Demods=1612. Limbo=3, Disabled=442. Hints=0.
% 2.03/2.31  Megabytes=9.67.
% 2.03/2.31  User_CPU=1.25, System_CPU=0.04, Wall_clock=1.
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  ============================== end of search =========================
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  THEOREM PROVED
% 2.03/2.31  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 2.03/2.31  
% 2.03/2.31  Process 30783 exit (max_proofs) Tue Apr 28 23:26:33 2026
% 2.03/2.31  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------