↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWX186+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 06:59:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.45s 3.67s
% Output   : Proof 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWX186+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 09:36:23 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.45/3.67  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.67  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X X2 : Iota), Ne nil (cons X X2)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Z : Iota), Eq (drop (s Z) nil) nil) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Z X2 X3 : Iota), Eq (drop (s Z) (cons X2 X3)) (drop Z X3)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #8 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun N => Exists fun Xs => Exists fun Ys => Not (Eq (drop N Xs) (drop N Ys) → Eq Xs Ys))) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #15 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (X2 : Iota), Ne nil (cons a X2)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Ne nil (cons a a_1)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne nil (cons a a_1)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #18 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (drop (s a) nil) nil) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (drop (s a) nil) nil
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #26 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (X2 X3 : Iota), Eq (drop (s a) (cons X2 X3)) (drop a X3)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (X3 : Iota), Eq (drop (s a) (cons a_1 X3)) (drop a X3)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Eq (drop (s a) (cons a_1 a_2)) (drop a a_2)) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #29 (by clausification #[28]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (drop (s a) (cons a_1 a_2)) (drop a a_2)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #30 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (Exists fun N => Exists fun Xs => Exists fun Ys => Not (Eq (drop N Xs) (drop N Ys) → Eq Xs Ys)) False
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #31 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Xs => Exists fun Ys => Not (Eq (drop a Xs) (drop a Ys) → Eq Xs Ys)) False
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Ys => Not (Eq (drop a a_1) (drop a Ys) → Eq a_1 Ys)) False
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #33 (by clausification #[32]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Not (Eq (drop a a_1) (drop a a_2) → Eq a_1 a_2)) False
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Eq (drop a a_1) (drop a a_2) → Eq a_1 a_2) True
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq (drop a a_1) (drop a a_2)) False) (Eq (Eq a_1 a_2) True)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (Eq a a_1) True) (Ne (drop a_2 a) (drop a_2 a_1))
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Ne (drop a a_1) (drop a a_2)) (Eq a_1 a_2)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #39 (by superposition #[37, 19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Ne nil (drop (s a) a_1)) (Eq nil a_1)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #46 (by superposition #[39, 29]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Ne nil (drop a a_1)) (Eq nil (cons a_2 a_1))
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #47 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[46, 17]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne nil (drop a a_1)
% 3.45/3.67  Clause #48 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[47, 19]): False
% 3.45/3.67  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------