↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SWX186+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9wvKrXfje0 true

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:08:46 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   63 (  10   ~;   3   |;   0   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0   ^;  23   !;   6   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nil_type,type,
    nil: $i ).

thf(drop_type,type,
    drop: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cons_type,type,
    cons: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(s_type,type,
    s: $i > $i ).

thf(axiom_006,axiom,
    ! [Z: $i] :
      ( ( drop @ ( s @ Z ) @ nil )
      = nil ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( drop @ ( s @ X0 ) @ nil )
      = nil ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_006]) ).

thf(axiom_007,axiom,
    ! [Z: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( drop @ ( s @ Z ) @ ( cons @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      = ( drop @ Z @ X3 ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( drop @ ( s @ X0 ) @ ( cons @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      = ( drop @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_007]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl5_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( drop @ ( s @ X0 ) @ nil )
      = nil ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_006]) ).

thf(goal_009,conjecture,
    ? [N: $i,Xs: $i,Ys: $i] :
      ~ ( ( ( drop @ N @ Xs )
          = ( drop @ N @ Ys ) )
       => ( Xs = Ys ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [N: $i,Xs: $i,Ys: $i] :
        ~ ( ( ( drop @ N @ Xs )
            = ( drop @ N @ Ys ) )
         => ( Xs = Ys ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[goal_009]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X0 )
      | ( ( drop @ X2 @ X1 )
       != ( drop @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( nil = X0 )
      | ( nil
       != ( drop @ ( s @ X1 ) @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl8]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl20,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( nil
        = ( cons @ X2 @ X0 ) )
      | ( nil
       != ( drop @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl9]) ).

thf(axiom_003,axiom,
    ! [X: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( nil
     != ( cons @ X @ X2 ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( nil
     != ( cons @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[axiom_003]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl21,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( nil
     != ( drop @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference('simplify_reflect-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl20,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
    nil != nil,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl21]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl23]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SWX186+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9wvKrXfje0 true
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Tue May  5 09:38:11 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.17/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.17/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.17/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.58/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.75  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.58/0.75  % BCE start: 9
% 0.58/0.75  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.58/0.75  % PE start: 9
% 0.58/0.75  logic: eq
% 0.58/0.75  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.58/0.75  % done 11 iterations in 0.008s
% 0.58/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.58/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.75  
% 0.58/0.75  
% 0.58/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.58/0.75  % Terminating...
% 0.63/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 0.63/0.88  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------