↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWX186-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:03:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 29.79s 4.21s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX186-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Tue May  5 09:38:25 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 29.79/4.21  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 29.79/4.21  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(impl(eq(drop(X0,X1),drop(X0,X2)),eq(X1,X2)),bfalse)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c1, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(impl(eq(drop(X0,X1),drop(X0,X2)),eq(X1,X2)),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	drop(s(X3),cons(X4,X5)) = drop(X3,X5)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	drop(X0,X1) = drop(s(X3),cons(X4,X5))).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c3, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c4, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c5, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X6 != drop(X3,X5) | btrue != eq3(impl(eq(X6,drop(X0,X2)),eq(X1,X2)),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c6, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	drop(z,X7) = X7).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	drop(X3,X5) = drop(z,X7)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c7, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(impl(eq(X6,drop(X0,X2)),eq(X1,X2)),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c8, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c9, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X8 != X7 | X6 != X8,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X8 = X7).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c10, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X6 != X8,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c9])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X6 = X8).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c11, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a3])], [c10])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c12, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue = eq(X9,X9)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	eq(X6,drop(X0,X2)) = eq(X9,X9)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c13, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c14, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c15, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X10 != btrue | btrue != eq3(impl(X10,eq(X1,X2)),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X10 = btrue).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c16, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(impl(X10,eq(X1,X2)),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c15])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c17, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	bfalse = eq(cons(X11,X12),nil)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	eq(X1,X2) = eq(cons(X11,X12),nil)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c18, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c19, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c20, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X13 != bfalse | btrue != eq3(impl(X10,X13),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X13 = bfalse).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c21, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(impl(X10,X13),bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a7])], [c20])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c22, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	impl(btrue,X14) = X14).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	impl(X10,X13) = impl(btrue,X14)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c23, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c24, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c25, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X15 != X14 | btrue != eq3(X15,bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c21, c22])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X15 = X14).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c26, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != eq3(X15,bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c25])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c27, axiom,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue = eq3(X16,X16)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	eq3(X15,bfalse) = eq3(X16,X16)).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c28, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c26, c27])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c29, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c26, c27])).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c30, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	X17 != btrue | btrue != X17,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c26, c27])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	X17 = btrue).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c31, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue != X17,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c30])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 29.79/4.21  	btrue = X17).
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c32, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c31])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  cnf(c33, plain,
% 29.79/4.21  	$false,
% 29.79/4.21  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X0, s(X3)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X1, cons(X4,X5)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X2, nil),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X3, z),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X4, X11),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X5, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X6, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X7, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X8, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X9, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X10, btrue),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X11, X11),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X12, drop(X0,X2)),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X13, bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X14, bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X15, bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X16, bfalse),
% 29.79/4.21  		bind(X17, btrue)
% 29.79/4.21  	],
% 29.79/4.21  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12])).
% 29.79/4.21  
% 29.79/4.21  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------