↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWX187+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:00:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.90s 0.71s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SWX187+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.16/0.35  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.35  % DateTime : Tue May  5 09:39:43 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.20/0.38  #
% 0.20/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.38  # Number of axioms: 18 Number of unprocessed: 18
% 0.20/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.20/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.20/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.30/0.48  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.30/0.48  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.30/0.48  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.30/0.48  # 18 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.30/0.48  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.30/0.48  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.30/0.48  # Found 15 unit axioms.
% 0.30/0.48  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.30/0.48  # 3 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.30/0.48  # 15 unit axiom clauses
% 0.30/0.48  
% 0.30/0.48  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.30/0.48  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.30/0.48  # Returning from population with 5 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.30/0.48  # We now have 5 tableaux to operate on
% 0.30/0.51  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.51  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.52  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.52  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.52  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.52  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.52  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.52  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.52  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.52  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.53  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.53  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.53  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.53  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.30/0.54  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.30/0.54  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 13 total branch saturation attempts.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 1 free duplicated saturations.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 13 total successful branch saturations.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 4 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 8 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin clausification derivation
% 1.90/0.71  
% 1.90/0.71  # End clausification derivation
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (length(nil)=z)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (x2(z,s(X1)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (proj1S(s(X1))=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (rotate(z,X1)=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (x(nil,X1)=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (head(cons(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (rotate(s(X1),nil)=nil)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (length(cons(X1,X2))=s(length(X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (tail(cons(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (x(cons(X1,X2),X3)=cons(X1,x(X2,X3)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (rotate(X1,x(X2,cons(X3,nil)))=rotate(s(X1),cons(X3,X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (~x2(z,z))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (s(X1)!=z)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~x2(s(X1),z))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (cons(X1,X2)!=nil)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (x2(X1,X2)|~x2(s(X1),s(X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (x2(s(X1),s(X2))|~x2(X1,X2))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (rotate(s(z),X1)=X1|X2=X3|rotate(X2,X1)!=rotate(X3,X1)|~x2(X3,length(X1))|~x2(X2,length(X1)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2410, plain, (X38=X38)).
% 1.90/0.71  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin printing tableau
% 1.90/0.71  # Found 32 steps
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil|s(nil)=z|rotate(s(nil),nil)!=rotate(z,nil)|~x2(z,length(nil))|~x2(s(nil),length(nil))), inference(start_rule)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2443, plain, (s(nil)=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2442, plain, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2418])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_9979, plain, (proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil))=proj1S(nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2421])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_9991, plain, (length(nil)!=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_9989, plain, (x(proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil)),length(nil))=x(proj1S(nil),z)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2422])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10002, plain, (length(nil)!=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2444, plain, (rotate(s(nil),nil)!=rotate(z,nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2413])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10021, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))!=rotate(s(nil),nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10022, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))!=rotate(z,nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10040, plain, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2419])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10042, plain, (rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)!=rotate(rotate(z,nil),nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2413])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10085, plain, (rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)!=proj1S(s(rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10043, plain, (~x2(rotate(z,nil),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10044, plain, (~x2(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2420])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10103, plain, (rotate(s(nil),nil)!=proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10104, plain, (z!=length(nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2445, plain, (~x2(z,length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10140, plain, (~x2(s(z),s(length(nil)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2420])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10175, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2410])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10176, plain, (proj1S(s(s(length(nil))))!=s(length(nil))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10177, plain, (~x2(s(z),proj1S(s(s(length(nil)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2446, plain, (~x2(s(nil),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2420])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10247, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2410])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10248, plain, (z!=length(nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10000, plain, (rotate(x(proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil)),length(nil)),length(nil))=rotate(x(proj1S(nil),z),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10000, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10053, plain, (length(rotate(s(z),nil))=length(nil)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10053, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10086, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)))!=rotate(rotate(z,nil),nil)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10086, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10092, plain, (~x2(s(rotate(z,nil)),s(length(nil)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10092, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10105, plain, (~x2(rotate(s(nil),nil),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10105, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10212, plain, (~x2(s(s(z)),s(proj1S(s(s(length(nil))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10212, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10249, plain, (~x2(s(nil),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10249, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  # End printing tableau
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS output end
% 1.90/0.71  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 13 total branch saturation attempts.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 1 free duplicated saturations.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 13 total successful branch saturations.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 4 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 1.90/0.71  # There were 8 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin clausification derivation
% 1.90/0.71  
% 1.90/0.71  # End clausification derivation
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (length(nil)=z)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (x2(z,s(X1)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (proj1S(s(X1))=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (rotate(z,X1)=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (x(nil,X1)=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (head(cons(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (rotate(s(X1),nil)=nil)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (length(cons(X1,X2))=s(length(X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (tail(cons(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (x(cons(X1,X2),X3)=cons(X1,x(X2,X3)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (rotate(X1,x(X2,cons(X3,nil)))=rotate(s(X1),cons(X3,X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (~x2(z,z))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (s(X1)!=z)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~x2(s(X1),z))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (cons(X1,X2)!=nil)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (x2(X1,X2)|~x2(s(X1),s(X2)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (x2(s(X1),s(X2))|~x2(X1,X2))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (rotate(s(z),X1)=X1|X2=X3|rotate(X2,X1)!=rotate(X3,X1)|~x2(X3,length(X1))|~x2(X2,length(X1)))).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2419, plain, (X38=X38)).
% 1.90/0.71  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 1.90/0.71  # Begin printing tableau
% 1.90/0.71  # Found 32 steps
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_18, negated_conjecture, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil|s(nil)=z|rotate(s(nil),nil)!=rotate(z,nil)|~x2(z,length(nil))|~x2(s(nil),length(nil))), inference(start_rule)).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2452, plain, (s(nil)=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2451, plain, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2427])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10008, plain, (proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil))=proj1S(nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2430])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10020, plain, (length(nil)!=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10018, plain, (x(proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil)),length(nil))=x(proj1S(nil),z)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2431])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10031, plain, (length(nil)!=z), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2453, plain, (rotate(s(nil),nil)!=rotate(z,nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2422])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10050, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))!=rotate(s(nil),nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10051, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))!=rotate(z,nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10069, plain, (rotate(s(z),nil)=nil), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2428])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10071, plain, (rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)!=rotate(rotate(z,nil),nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2422])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10114, plain, (rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)!=proj1S(s(rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10072, plain, (~x2(rotate(z,nil),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10073, plain, (~x2(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2429])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10132, plain, (rotate(s(nil),nil)!=proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10133, plain, (z!=length(nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2454, plain, (~x2(z,length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10169, plain, (~x2(s(z),s(length(nil)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2429])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10204, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2419])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10205, plain, (proj1S(s(s(length(nil))))!=s(length(nil))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10206, plain, (~x2(s(z),proj1S(s(s(length(nil)))))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_2455, plain, (~x2(s(nil),length(nil))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_2429])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10276, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2419])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10277, plain, (z!=length(nil)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10029, plain, (rotate(x(proj1S(rotate(s(z),nil)),length(nil)),length(nil))=rotate(x(proj1S(nil),z),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10029, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10082, plain, (length(rotate(s(z),nil))=length(nil)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10082, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10115, plain, (proj1S(s(rotate(proj1S(s(rotate(s(nil),nil))),nil)))!=rotate(rotate(z,nil),nil)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10115, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10121, plain, (~x2(s(rotate(z,nil)),s(length(nil)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10121, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10134, plain, (~x2(rotate(s(nil),nil),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10134, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10241, plain, (~x2(s(s(z)),s(proj1S(s(s(length(nil))))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10241, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  cnf(i_0_10278, plain, (~x2(s(nil),z)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_10278, ...])).
% 1.90/0.71  # End printing tableau
% 1.90/0.71  # SZS output end
% 1.90/0.71  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 1.90/0.72  # Child (19583) has found a proof.
% 1.90/0.72  
% 1.90/0.72  # Proof search is over...
% 1.90/0.72  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------