↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWX199+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:34:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.48s 1.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  31 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  117 (  64 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   99 (  48   ~;  42   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  144 (  10 sgn  48   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goal_013,conjecture,
    ? [X6,X8,X9] :
      ~ ( merge(X6,X8) = merge(X8,X6)
       => ( merge(X6,X9) = merge(X9,X6)
         => merge(X8,X9) = merge(X9,X8) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal_013) ).

fof(axiom_010,axiom,
    ! [X4,X6] : merge(cons(X4,X6),nil) = cons(X4,X6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_010) ).

fof(axiom_009,axiom,
    ! [X3] : merge(nil,X3) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_009) ).

fof(axiom_012,axiom,
    ! [X4,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ leqNat(X4,X7)
     => merge(cons(X4,X6),cons(X7,X8)) = cons(X7,merge(cons(X4,X6),X8)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_012) ).

fof(axiom_011,axiom,
    ! [X4,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( leqNat(X4,X7)
     => merge(cons(X4,X6),cons(X7,X8)) = cons(X4,merge(X6,cons(X7,X8))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_011) ).

fof(axiom_006,axiom,
    ! [X3] : leqNat(z,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_006) ).

fof(axiom_001,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : head(cons(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_001) ).

fof(axiom_002,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : tail(cons(X1,X2)) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_002) ).

fof(axiom_008,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( leqNat(s(X4),s(X5))
    <=> leqNat(X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_008) ).

fof(axiom_007,axiom,
    ! [X4] : ~ leqNat(s(X4),z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_007) ).

fof(axiom_005,axiom,
    ! [X1] : z != s(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_005) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X6,X8,X9] :
        ~ ( merge(X6,X8) = merge(X8,X6)
         => ( merge(X6,X9) = merge(X9,X6)
           => merge(X8,X9) = merge(X9,X8) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goal_013]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X59,X60,X61] :
      ( merge(X59,X60) != merge(X60,X59)
      | merge(X59,X61) != merge(X61,X59)
      | merge(X60,X61) = merge(X61,X60) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X49,X50] : merge(cons(X49,X50),nil) = cons(X49,X50),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_010]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X48] : merge(nil,X48) = X48,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_009]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X4,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ leqNat(X4,X7)
     => merge(cons(X4,X6),cons(X7,X8)) = cons(X7,merge(cons(X4,X6),X8)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_012]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53,X54] :
      ( ~ leqNat(X51,X53)
      | merge(cons(X51,X52),cons(X53,X54)) = cons(X51,merge(X52,cons(X53,X54))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_011])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X2,X3) = merge(X3,X2)
    | merge(X1,X2) != merge(X2,X1)
    | merge(X1,X3) != merge(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    merge(cons(X1,X2),nil) = cons(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    merge(nil,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57,X58] :
      ( leqNat(X55,X57)
      | merge(cons(X55,X56),cons(X57,X58)) = cons(X57,merge(cons(X55,X56),X58)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( merge(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = cons(X1,merge(X3,cons(X2,X4)))
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,cons(X2,X3)) = merge(cons(X2,X3),X1)
    | merge(X1,nil) != X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( leqNat(X1,X2)
    | merge(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = cons(X2,merge(cons(X1,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(cons(X1,X2),cons(X3,X4)) = cons(X3,merge(X4,cons(X1,X2)))
    | ~ leqNat(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X44] : leqNat(z,X44),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_006]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] : head(cons(X36,X37)) = X36,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_001]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X38,X39] : tail(cons(X38,X39)) = X39,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_002]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,X4))) = cons(X1,merge(cons(X3,X4),X2))
    | leqNat(X3,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    leqNat(z,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    head(cons(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,X4))) = cons(X3,merge(X4,cons(X1,X2)))
    | ~ leqNat(X3,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X46,X47] :
      ( ( ~ leqNat(s(X46),s(X47))
        | leqNat(X46,X47) )
      & ( ~ leqNat(X46,X47)
        | leqNat(s(X46),s(X47)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_008])]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X4] : ~ leqNat(s(X4),z),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_007]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    tail(cons(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(z,merge(X1,cons(X2,X3))) = cons(z,merge(cons(X2,X3),X1))
    | leqNat(X2,z) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ leqNat(X2,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( leqNat(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

fof(c_0_38,plain,
    ! [X45] : ~ leqNat(s(X45),z),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,nil) = X1
    | merge(cons(X2,X3),X1) != merge(X1,cons(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,cons(X2,X3)) = merge(cons(X2,X3),X1)
    | leqNat(X2,z) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(X1) = s(X2)
    | ~ leqNat(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ leqNat(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ~ leqNat(s(X1),z),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,nil) = X1
    | leqNat(X2,z) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(X1) = s(X2)
    | ~ leqNat(X2,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,X2) = merge(X2,X1)
    | merge(X2,nil) != X2
    | merge(X1,nil) != X1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    merge(X1,nil) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( s(X1) = s(z)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,z) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    merge(X1,X2) = merge(X2,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( leqNat(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ leqNat(X1,z) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_47]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,nil))) = cons(X3,cons(X1,X2))
    | ~ leqNat(X3,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,X4))) = cons(X3,merge(cons(X1,X2),X4))
    | ~ leqNat(X3,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( leqNat(s(z),s(X1))
    | ~ leqNat(X2,z) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,X2) = merge(X2,cons(X3,nil))
    | ~ leqNat(X3,X1)
    | ~ leqNat(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_50]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(X1,cons(X2,X3)) = merge(cons(X4,X1),X3)
    | ~ leqNat(X2,X4)
    | ~ leqNat(X4,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_51]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    leqNat(s(z),s(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( cons(X1,X2) = merge(X2,cons(z,nil))
    | ~ leqNat(X1,z) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( merge(cons(s(X1),X2),X3) = merge(X2,cons(s(z),X3))
    | ~ leqNat(s(X1),s(z)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    merge(X1,cons(z,nil)) = cons(z,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    merge(cons(s(z),X1),X2) = merge(X1,cons(s(z),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_55]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    merge(cons(z,nil),X1) = cons(z,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    merge(X1,cons(s(z),nil)) = cons(s(z),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_59]) ).

fof(c_0_62,plain,
    ! [X43] : z != s(X43),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_005]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    cons(s(z),cons(z,nil)) = cons(z,cons(s(z),nil)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    z != s(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_63]),c_0_30]),c_0_64]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWX199+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 07:55:47 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.48/1.79  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.48/1.79  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.79  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.79  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.80  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------