↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SWX199-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:34:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.33s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  45 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   53 (  52 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  114 (  19 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_010,axiom,
    prop_merge_comm(X1,X2,X3) = impl(eq(merge(X1,X2),merge(X2,X1)),impl(eq(merge(X1,X3),merge(X3,X1)),eq(merge(X2,X3),merge(X3,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_010) ).

cnf(axiom_006,axiom,
    merge(cons(X1,X2),nil) = cons(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_006) ).

cnf(axiom_005,axiom,
    merge(nil,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_005) ).

cnf(axiom_016,axiom,
    eq(X1,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_016) ).

cnf(axiom_008,axiom,
    impl(btrue,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_008) ).

cnf(axiom_007,axiom,
    merge(cons(X1,X2),cons(X3,X4)) = aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,leqNat(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_007) ).

cnf(axiom_002,axiom,
    leqNat(z,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_002) ).

cnf(axiom,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,btrue) = cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,X4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom) ).

cnf(axiom_020,axiom,
    ( eq(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = eq(X3,X4)
    | eq2(X1,X2) != btrue ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_020) ).

cnf(axiom_017,axiom,
    eq2(X1,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_017) ).

cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(prop_merge_comm(X1,X2,X3),bfalse) != btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

cnf(axiom_003,axiom,
    leqNat(s(X1),z) = bfalse,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_003) ).

cnf(axiom_001,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,bfalse) = cons(X3,merge(cons(X1,X2),X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_001) ).

cnf(axiom_004,axiom,
    leqNat(s(X1),s(X2)) = leqNat(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_004) ).

cnf(axiom_019,axiom,
    ( eq(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = bfalse
    | eq2(X1,X2) != bfalse ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_019) ).

cnf(axiom_014,axiom,
    eq2(z,s(X1)) = bfalse,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_014) ).

cnf(axiom_018,axiom,
    eq3(X1,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_018) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    prop_merge_comm(X1,X2,X3) = impl(eq(merge(X1,X2),merge(X2,X1)),impl(eq(merge(X1,X3),merge(X3,X1)),eq(merge(X2,X3),merge(X3,X2)))),
    axiom_010 ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    merge(cons(X1,X2),nil) = cons(X1,X2),
    axiom_006 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    merge(nil,X1) = X1,
    axiom_005 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    eq(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_016 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    impl(btrue,X1) = X1,
    axiom_008 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    merge(cons(X1,X2),cons(X3,X4)) = aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,leqNat(X1,X3)),
    axiom_007 ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    leqNat(z,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_002 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,btrue) = cons(X1,merge(X2,cons(X3,X4))),
    axiom ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    impl(eq(X1,merge(X1,nil)),eq(merge(X1,cons(X2,X3)),merge(cons(X2,X3),X1))) = prop_merge_comm(nil,X1,cons(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    merge(cons(z,X1),cons(X2,X3)) = cons(z,merge(X1,cons(X2,X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    ( eq(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = eq(X3,X4)
    | eq2(X1,X2) != btrue ),
    axiom_020 ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    eq2(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_017 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    eq(merge(cons(X1,X2),cons(z,X3)),cons(z,merge(X3,cons(X1,X2)))) = prop_merge_comm(nil,cons(X1,X2),cons(z,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_18]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    eq(cons(X1,X2),cons(X1,X3)) = eq(X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(prop_merge_comm(X1,X2,X3),bfalse) != btrue,
    goal ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    eq(merge(X1,cons(z,X2)),merge(X2,cons(z,X1))) = prop_merge_comm(nil,cons(z,X1),cons(z,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_26]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    leqNat(s(X1),z) = bfalse,
    axiom_003 ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,X3,X4,bfalse) = cons(X3,merge(cons(X1,X2),X4)),
    axiom_001 ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    leqNat(s(X1),s(X2)) = leqNat(X1,X2),
    axiom_004 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(eq(merge(X1,cons(z,X2)),merge(X2,cons(z,X1))),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    merge(cons(s(X1),X2),cons(z,X3)) = cons(z,merge(cons(s(X1),X2),X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    aux(s(X1),X2,s(X3),X4,leqNat(X1,X3)) = merge(cons(s(X1),X2),cons(s(X3),X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(eq(merge(X1,cons(z,cons(s(X2),X3))),cons(z,merge(cons(s(X2),X3),X1))),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    merge(cons(s(z),X1),cons(s(X2),X3)) = cons(s(z),merge(X1,cons(s(X2),X3))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(eq(merge(cons(s(X1),X2),cons(s(z),X3)),cons(s(z),merge(X3,cons(s(X1),X2)))),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_37]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(eq(merge(X1,cons(s(z),X2)),merge(X2,cons(s(z),X1))),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_40]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,axiom,
    ( eq(cons(X1,X3),cons(X2,X4)) = bfalse
    | eq2(X1,X2) != bfalse ),
    axiom_019 ).

cnf(c_0_44,axiom,
    eq2(z,s(X1)) = bfalse,
    axiom_014 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    eq3(eq(merge(X1,cons(s(z),nil)),cons(s(z),X1)),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    eq(cons(z,X1),cons(s(X2),X3)) = bfalse,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    eq3(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_018 ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_26]),c_0_46]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWX199-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 07:55:46 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.33/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.33/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.33/1.74  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------