↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWX200+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 06:59:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.66s 3.87s
% Output   : Proof 3.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWX200+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 11:16:10 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.66/3.87  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.87  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Z : Iota), Not (leqNat (s Z) z)) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #8 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (merge nil Y) Y) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #12 (by assumption #[]): Eq (ord nil) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #14 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y Y2 Xs : Iota), Iff (ord (cons Y (cons Y2 Xs))) (And (leqNat Y Y2) (ord (cons Y2 Xs)))) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #15 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun Xs => Exists fun Ys => Not (ord Xs → Not (ord Ys) → ord (merge Xs Ys)))) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #20 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (leqNat (s a) z)) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (leqNat (s a) z) False
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #27 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (merge nil a) a) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (merge nil a) a
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #66 (by clausification #[15]): Eq (Exists fun Xs => Exists fun Ys => Not (ord Xs → Not (ord Ys) → ord (merge Xs Ys))) False
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #67 (by clausification #[66]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Exists fun Ys => Not (ord a → Not (ord Ys) → ord (merge a Ys))) False
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #68 (by clausification #[67]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Not (ord a → Not (ord a_1) → ord (merge a a_1))) False
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #69 (by clausification #[68]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (ord a → Not (ord a_1) → ord (merge a a_1)) True
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #70 (by clausification #[69]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (ord a) False) (Eq (Not (ord a_1) → ord (merge a a_1)) True)
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #71 (by clausification #[70]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (ord a) False) (Or (Eq (Not (ord a_1)) False) (Eq (ord (merge a a_1)) True))
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #72 (by clausification #[71]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (ord a) False) (Or (Eq (ord (merge a a_1)) True) (Eq (ord a_1) True))
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #73 (by superposition #[72, 12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (ord (merge nil a)) True) (Or (Eq (ord a) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #82 (by clausification #[73]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (ord (merge nil a)) True) (Eq (ord a) True)
% 3.66/3.87  Clause #83 (by forward demodulation #[82, 28]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (ord a) True) (Eq (ord a) True)
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #84 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[83]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (ord a) True
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #96 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (Y2 Xs : Iota), Iff (ord (cons a (cons Y2 Xs))) (And (leqNat a Y2) (ord (cons Y2 Xs)))) True
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #97 (by clausification #[96]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xs : Iota), Iff (ord (cons a (cons a_1 Xs))) (And (leqNat a a_1) (ord (cons a_1 Xs)))) True
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #98 (by clausification #[97]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (Iff (ord (cons a (cons a_1 a_2))) (And (leqNat a a_1) (ord (cons a_1 a_2)))) True
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #100 (by clausification #[98]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (ord (cons a (cons a_1 a_2))) False) (Eq (And (leqNat a a_1) (ord (cons a_1 a_2))) True)
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #105 (by clausification #[100]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (ord (cons a (cons a_1 a_2))) False) (Eq (leqNat a a_1) True)
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #107 (by superposition #[105, 84]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (leqNat a a_1) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #108 (by clausification #[107]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (leqNat a a_1) True
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #113 (by superposition #[108, 21]): Eq True False
% 3.66/3.88  Clause #114 (by clausification #[113]): False
% 3.66/3.88  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------