↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SWX204+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 06:59:10 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.75s 4.90s
% Output   : Proof 4.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWX204+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 11:28:30 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.75/4.90  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.75/4.90  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), Eq (proj1S (s X)) X) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), Ne z (s X)) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (x2 z Y) Y) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y N : Iota), Eq (x2 (s N) Y) (s (x2 N Y))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), Eq (x22 z Y) z) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Y N : Iota), Eq (x22 (s N) Y) (x2 Y (x22 N Y))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun X => Ne (x22 X X) X)) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #7 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Ne z (s a)) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Ne z (s a)
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #9 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (proj1S (s a)) a) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (proj1S (s a)) a
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #11 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (x2 z a) a) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x2 z a) a
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #13 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Eq (x22 z a) z) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x22 z a) z
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #15 (by clausification #[6]): Eq (Exists fun X => Ne (x22 X X) X) False
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Ne (x22 a a) a) False
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x22 a a) a
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #18 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (N : Iota), Eq (x2 (s N) a) (s (x2 N a))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (x2 (s a) a_1) (s (x2 a a_1))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (x2 (s a) a_1) (s (x2 a a_1))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #22 (by superposition #[20, 10]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (proj1S (x2 (s a) a_1)) (x2 a a_1)
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #23 (by superposition #[20, 12]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x2 (s z) a) (s a)
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #25 (by superposition #[23, 20]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x2 (s (s z)) a) (s (s a))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #30 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (∀ (N : Iota), Eq (x22 (s N) a) (x2 a (x22 N a))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #31 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (Eq (x22 (s a) a_1) (x2 a_1 (x22 a a_1))) True
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #32 (by clausification #[31]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (x22 (s a) a_1) (x2 a_1 (x22 a a_1))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #38 (by superposition #[32, 22]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (proj1S (x22 (s a) (s a_1))) (x2 a_1 (x22 a (s a_1)))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #53 (by superposition #[25, 32]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (x22 (s a) (s (s z))) (s (s (x22 a (s (s z)))))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #108 (by superposition #[38, 23]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (proj1S (x22 (s a) (s (s z)))) (s (x22 a (s (s z))))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #245 (by superposition #[53, 14]): Eq (x22 (s z) (s (s z))) (s (s z))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #809 (by superposition #[108, 17]): Eq (proj1S (s (s z))) (s (x22 (s z) (s (s z))))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #814 (by forward demodulation #[809, 10]): Eq (s z) (s (x22 (s z) (s (s z))))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #815 (by forward demodulation #[814, 245]): Eq (s z) (s (s (s z)))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #822 (by superposition #[815, 10]): Eq (proj1S (s z)) (s (s z))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #956 (by forward demodulation #[822, 10]): Eq z (s (s z))
% 4.75/4.90  Clause #957 (by forward contextual literal cutting #[956, 8]): False
% 4.75/4.90  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------