↑ Up

Prover9---1109a.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SWX204+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr 29 02:38:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.70s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem  : SWX204+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.09/0.25  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.25  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.25  % DateTime : Wed Apr 29 00:50:45 EDT 2026
% 0.09/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.70  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.70  Process 22852 was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.70  Wed Apr 29 00:50:46 2026
% 0.42/0.70  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_22627_n012.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_22627_n012.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.70  set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.70      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.70      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.70      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.70  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.70  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.70  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.70  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.70  clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (7 formulas)
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.70  1 (all X proj1S(s(X)) = X) # label(axiom_001) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  2 (all X z != s(X)) # label(axiom_002) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  3 (all Y x2(z,Y) = Y) # label(axiom_003) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  4 (all Y all N x2(s(N),Y) = s(x2(N,Y))) # label(axiom_004) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  5 (all Y x22(z,Y) = z) # label(axiom_005) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  6 (all Y all N x22(s(N),Y) = x2(Y,x22(N,Y))) # label(axiom_006) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  7 -(exists X x22(X,X) != X) # label(goal_007) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  Auto_denials:
% 0.42/0.70    % copying label axiom_002 to answer in negative clause
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.70  Function symbol KB weights:  z=1. x2=1. x22=1. s=1. proj1S=1.
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.70  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.70  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: axiom_002.
% 0.42/0.70  % Length of proof is 29.
% 0.42/0.70  % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.42/0.70  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.42/0.70  % Given clauses 26.
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  1 (all X proj1S(s(X)) = X) # label(axiom_001) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  2 (all X z != s(X)) # label(axiom_002) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  3 (all Y x2(z,Y) = Y) # label(axiom_003) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  4 (all Y all N x2(s(N),Y) = s(x2(N,Y))) # label(axiom_004) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  5 (all Y x22(z,Y) = z) # label(axiom_005) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  6 (all Y all N x22(s(N),Y) = x2(Y,x22(N,Y))) # label(axiom_006) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  7 -(exists X x22(X,X) != X) # label(goal_007) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.42/0.70  8 proj1S(s(A)) = A # label(axiom_001) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.42/0.70  9 x2(z,A) = A # label(axiom_003) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.42/0.70  10 x22(z,A) = z # label(axiom_005) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 0.42/0.70  11 x22(A,A) = A # label(goal_007) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(7)].
% 0.42/0.70  12 x2(s(A),B) = s(x2(A,B)) # label(axiom_004) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.42/0.70  13 s(x2(A,B)) = x2(s(A),B).  [copy(12),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  14 x22(s(A),B) = x2(B,x22(A,B)) # label(axiom_006) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.42/0.70  15 x2(A,x22(B,A)) = x22(s(B),A).  [copy(14),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  16 s(A) != z # label(axiom_002) # label(axiom) # answer(axiom_002).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.42/0.70  17 proj1S(x2(s(A),B)) = x2(A,B).  [para(13(a,1),8(a,1,1))].
% 0.42/0.70  18 x2(s(z),A) = s(A).  [para(9(a,1),13(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  20 x22(s(z),A) = x2(A,z).  [para(10(a,1),15(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  24 proj1S(x2(x2(s(A),B),C)) = x2(x2(A,B),C).  [para(13(a,1),17(a,1,1,1))].
% 0.42/0.70  35 x2(s(s(z)),A) = s(s(A)).  [para(18(a,1),13(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  38 x22(s(s(z)),A) = x2(A,x2(A,z)).  [para(20(a,1),15(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  54 x2(s(s(s(z))),A) = s(s(s(A))).  [para(35(a,1),13(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  71 s(s(s(s(z)))) = s(s(z)).  [para(38(a,1),11(a,1)),rewrite([35(8),35(7)])].
% 0.42/0.70  75 s(s(s(z))) = s(z).  [para(71(a,1),8(a,1,1)),rewrite([8(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  78 s(s(s(A))) = s(A).  [back_rewrite(54),rewrite([75(4),18(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  82 x2(s(s(A)),B) = x2(A,B).  [para(35(a,1),24(a,2,1)),rewrite([78(4),18(3),17(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  88 s(s(A)) = A.  [back_rewrite(35),rewrite([82(4),9(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.42/0.70  89 $F # answer(axiom_002).  [resolve(88,a,16,a)].
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  Given=26. Generated=264. Kept=79. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.70  Usable=24. Sos=40. Demods=34. Limbo=6, Disabled=15. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.70  Megabytes=0.11.
% 0.42/0.70  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.70  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.70  
% 0.42/0.70  Process 22852 exit (max_proofs) Wed Apr 29 00:50:46 2026
% 0.42/0.70  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------