↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.CSA-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWX205+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:00:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.18s 0.36s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX205+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May  5 11:30:15 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36  #
% 0.18/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36  # Number of axioms: 3 Number of unprocessed: 3
% 0.18/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36  # 3 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36  # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36  # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.36  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.18/0.36  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.18/0.36  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.18/0.36  # 12333 Satisfiable branch
% 0.18/0.36  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.36  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.36  # SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (proj1S(s(X1))=X1)).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (s(X1)!=z)).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_3, negated_conjecture, (s(X1)!=X1)).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X5=X5)).
% 0.18/0.36  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.36  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36  # Found 4 steps
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (proj1S(s(X8))=X8), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (proj1S(s(X8))=X8), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (proj1S(proj1S(s(X8)))=proj1S(X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.18/0.36  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (proj1S(proj1S(s(X8)))=s(proj1S(proj1S(s(X8))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_3])).
% 0.18/0.36  # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36  # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.36  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.36  # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.18/0.36  # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.36  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.18/0.36  # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.36  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------