↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWX205-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:14:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.42s
% Output   : Saturation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_13ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_20ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    eq2(btrue,bfalse) = bfalse,
    axiom_004,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    impl(eq(s(X1),X1),bfalse) = plus_ninf(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    eq(s(X1),z) = bfalse,
    axiom_007,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    impl(bfalse,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_001,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    eq2(plus_ninf(X1),bfalse) != btrue,
    c_0_13,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    plus_ninf(z) = btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    eq(s(X1),s(X2)) = eq(X1,X2),
    axiom_005,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    btrue != bfalse,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_12]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    plus_ninf(s(X1)) = plus_ninf(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_19]),c_0_14]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    eq(z,s(X1)) = bfalse,
    axiom_006,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    eq2(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_009,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    eq(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_008,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    impl(btrue,X1) = X1,
    axiom,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    eq2(bfalse,btrue) = bfalse,
    axiom_003,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWX205-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:35:01 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % sh5l with pid 4066300 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.42  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.42  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.42  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4066306 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.42  % Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.42  % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % No proof found!
% 0.12/0.42  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.12/0.42  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.12/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.12/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.12/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.12/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.12/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 0.12/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 5
% 0.12/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.12/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 5
% 0.12/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.12/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.12/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 14
% 0.12/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.12/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.12/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.12/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.12/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 206
% 0.12/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.42  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.12/0.42  
% 0.12/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.42  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.12/0.42  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.12/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------