↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWX217+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:00:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.14s 1.06s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX217+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May  5 12:14:01 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.37  #
% 0.19/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37  # Number of axioms: 23 Number of unprocessed: 23
% 0.19/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37  # 23 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37  # Found 19 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37  # 4 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # 19 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37  
% 0.19/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.19/0.37  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.19/0.37  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.19/0.37  # Returning from population with 39 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.37  # We now have 39 tableaux to operate on
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 5.14/1.06  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 5.14/1.06  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.14/1.06  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.14/1.06  # Begin clausification derivation
% 5.14/1.06  
% 5.14/1.06  # End clausification derivation
% 5.14/1.06  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (shw(zero)=nil)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (rd(nil)=zero)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (half(zero)=zero)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (evenNat(zero))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (proj1Suc(suc(X1))=X1)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (append(nil,X1)=X1)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (addNat(zero,X1)=X1)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (half(suc(zero))=zero)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (head(cons(X1,X2))=X1)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (tail(cons(X1,X2))=X2)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (addNat(rd(X1),rd(X1))=rd(cons(o,X1)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (half(suc(suc(X1)))=suc(half(X1)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (addNat(suc(X1),X2)=suc(addNat(X1,X2)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (append(cons(X1,X2),X3)=cons(X1,append(X2,X3)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (suc(rd(cons(o,X1)))=rd(cons(i,X1)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_25, negated_conjecture, (rd(append(shw(X1),shw(X2)))=rd(append(shw(X2),shw(X1))))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (i!=o)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (suc(X1)!=zero)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (cons(X1,X2)!=nil)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (~evenNat(suc(X1))|~evenNat(X1))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (evenNat(suc(X1))|evenNat(X1))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (cons(o,shw(half(suc(X1))))=shw(suc(X1))|~evenNat(suc(X1)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (cons(i,shw(half(suc(X1))))=shw(suc(X1))|evenNat(suc(X1)))).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X33=X33)).
% 5.14/1.06  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 5.14/1.06  # Begin printing tableau
% 5.14/1.06  # Found 6 steps
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (shw(zero)=nil), inference(start_rule)).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (shw(zero)=nil), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_47])).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_113, plain, (shw(zero)!=nil), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_111, plain, (append(shw(zero),shw(zero))=append(nil,nil)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_133, plain, (append(nil,nil)!=proj1Suc(suc(append(nil,nil)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 5.14/1.06  cnf(i_0_131, plain, (append(shw(zero),shw(zero))=proj1Suc(suc(append(nil,nil)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_131, ...])).
% 5.14/1.06  # End printing tableau
% 5.14/1.06  # SZS output end
% 5.14/1.06  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 5.14/1.06  # Child (15563) has found a proof.
% 5.14/1.06  
% 5.14/1.06  # Proof search is over...
% 5.14/1.06  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------