↑ Up

Prover9---1109a.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SWX217-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr 29 02:38:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 1.01s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX217-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Apr 29 01:47:35 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/1.01  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/1.01  Process 20103 was started by sandbox on n010.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/1.01  Wed Apr 29 01:47:36 2026
% 0.44/1.01  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19950_n010.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19950_n010.cluster.edu
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/1.01  set(auto2).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/1.01      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/1.01      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/1.01      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.01  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/1.01  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/1.01  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/1.01  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/1.01  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (32 formulas)
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  Auto_denials:
% 0.44/1.01    % copying label goal to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/1.01  Function symbol KB weights:  bfalse=1. zero=1. btrue=1. i=1. o=1. nil=1. cons=1. eq=1. addNat=1. append=1. aux=1. eq2=1. eq3=1. x=1. sat_comm=1. suc=1. half=1. rd=1. shw=1. evenNat=1. double=1. notb=1.
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/1.01  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/1.01  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % Proof 1 at 0.03 (+ 0.00) seconds: goal.
% 0.44/1.01  % Length of proof is 62.
% 0.44/1.01  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.44/1.01  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.44/1.01  % Given clauses 115.
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  1 notb(btrue) = bfalse # label(axiom_002) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  2 notb(bfalse) = btrue # label(axiom_003) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  3 half(zero) = zero # label(axiom_004) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  4 evenNat(zero) = btrue # label(axiom_007) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  5 shw(zero) = nil # label(axiom_009) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  6 rd(nil) = zero # label(axiom_016) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  7 half(suc(zero)) = zero # label(axiom_005) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  8 append(nil,A) = A # label(axiom_011) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  9 addNat(zero,A) = A # label(axiom_013) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  15 eq2(A,A) = btrue # label(axiom_029) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  17 double(A) = addNat(A,A) # label(axiom_015) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  19 eq(suc(A),zero) = bfalse # label(axiom_027) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  20 evenNat(suc(A)) = notb(evenNat(A)) # label(axiom_008) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  21 notb(evenNat(A)) = evenNat(suc(A)).  [copy(20),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  22 half(suc(suc(A))) = suc(half(A)) # label(axiom_006) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  23 rd(cons(o,A)) = double(rd(A)) # label(axiom_018) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  24 addNat(rd(A),rd(A)) = rd(cons(o,A)).  [copy(23),rewrite([17(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  25 shw(suc(A)) = aux(A,evenNat(suc(A))) # label(axiom_010) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  26 aux(A,evenNat(suc(A))) = shw(suc(A)).  [copy(25),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  27 addNat(suc(A),B) = suc(addNat(A,B)) # label(axiom_014) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  28 suc(addNat(A,B)) = addNat(suc(A),B).  [copy(27),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  29 rd(cons(i,A)) = suc(double(rd(A))) # label(axiom_017) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  30 suc(rd(cons(o,A))) = rd(cons(i,A)).  [copy(29),rewrite([17(5),24(6)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  31 eq(suc(A),suc(B)) = eq(A,B) # label(axiom_025) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  32 aux(A,btrue) = cons(o,shw(half(suc(A)))) # label(axiom) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  33 cons(o,shw(half(suc(A)))) = aux(A,btrue).  [copy(32),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  34 aux(A,bfalse) = cons(i,shw(half(suc(A)))) # label(axiom_001) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  35 cons(i,shw(half(suc(A)))) = aux(A,bfalse).  [copy(34),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  36 x(A,B) = rd(append(shw(A),shw(B))) # label(axiom_019) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  37 append(cons(A,B),C) = cons(A,append(B,C)) # label(axiom_012) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  38 sat_comm(A,B) = eq(x(A,B),x(B,A)) # label(axiom_020) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  39 sat_comm(A,B) = eq(rd(append(shw(A),shw(B))),rd(append(shw(B),shw(A)))).  [copy(38),rewrite([36(2),36(6)])].
% 0.44/1.01  40 eq2(sat_comm(A,B),bfalse) != btrue # label(goal) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(goal).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.01  41 eq2(eq(rd(append(shw(A),shw(B))),rd(append(shw(B),shw(A)))),bfalse) != btrue # answer(goal).  [copy(40),rewrite([39(1)])].
% 0.44/1.01  42 evenNat(suc(zero)) = bfalse.  [para(4(a,1),21(a,1,1)),rewrite([1(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  43 rd(cons(o,nil)) = zero.  [para(6(a,1),24(a,1,1)),rewrite([6(3),9(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  44 addNat(suc(zero),A) = suc(A).  [para(9(a,1),28(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  48 addNat(suc(rd(A)),rd(A)) = rd(cons(i,A)).  [para(24(a,1),28(a,1,1)),rewrite([30(4)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  59 cons(o,shw(suc(half(A)))) = aux(suc(A),btrue).  [para(22(a,1),33(a,1,2,1))].
% 0.44/1.01  61 suc(rd(aux(A,btrue))) = rd(aux(A,bfalse)).  [para(33(a,1),30(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([35(9)])].
% 0.44/1.01  63 aux(zero,bfalse) = cons(i,nil).  [para(7(a,1),35(a,1,2,1)),rewrite([5(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  64 cons(i,shw(suc(half(A)))) = aux(suc(A),bfalse).  [para(22(a,1),35(a,1,2,1))].
% 0.44/1.01  72 evenNat(suc(suc(zero))) = btrue.  [para(42(a,1),21(a,1,1)),rewrite([2(2)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  73 shw(suc(zero)) = cons(i,nil).  [para(42(a,1),26(a,1,2)),rewrite([63(3)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  75 rd(cons(i,nil)) = suc(zero).  [para(43(a,1),30(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  77 shw(suc(suc(zero))) = aux(suc(zero),btrue).  [para(72(a,1),26(a,1,2)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  78 addNat(suc(suc(zero)),A) = suc(suc(A)).  [para(44(a,1),28(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  82 eq2(eq(rd(append(shw(A),cons(i,nil))),rd(cons(i,shw(A)))),bfalse) != btrue # answer(goal).  [para(73(a,1),41(a,1,1,1,1,2)),rewrite([73(9),37(11),8(10)])].
% 0.44/1.01  83 rd(cons(o,cons(i,nil))) = suc(suc(zero)).  [para(75(a,1),24(a,1,1)),rewrite([75(6),44(5)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  121 eq2(eq(rd(append(aux(suc(zero),btrue),cons(i,nil))),rd(cons(i,aux(suc(zero),btrue)))),bfalse) != btrue # answer(goal).  [para(77(a,1),82(a,1,1,1,1,1)),rewrite([77(14)])].
% 0.44/1.01  122 addNat(suc(suc(suc(zero))),A) = suc(suc(suc(A))).  [para(78(a,1),28(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  162 rd(cons(i,cons(o,cons(i,nil)))) = suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(zero))))).  [para(83(a,1),48(a,1,1,1)),rewrite([83(10),122(8)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  200 cons(o,cons(i,nil)) = aux(suc(zero),btrue).  [para(3(a,1),59(a,1,2,1,1)),rewrite([73(4)])].
% 0.44/1.01  204 rd(cons(i,aux(suc(zero),btrue))) = suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(zero))))).  [back_rewrite(162),rewrite([200(6)])].
% 0.44/1.01  206 rd(aux(suc(zero),btrue)) = suc(suc(zero)).  [back_rewrite(83),rewrite([200(5)])].
% 0.44/1.01  207 eq2(eq(rd(append(aux(suc(zero),btrue),cons(i,nil))),suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(zero)))))),bfalse) != btrue # answer(goal).  [back_rewrite(121),rewrite([204(16)])].
% 0.44/1.01  211 rd(aux(suc(zero),bfalse)) = suc(suc(suc(zero))).  [para(206(a,1),61(a,1,1)),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  212 append(aux(suc(zero),btrue),A) = cons(o,cons(i,A)).  [para(200(a,1),37(a,1,1)),rewrite([37(10),8(9)])].
% 0.44/1.01  214 eq2(eq(rd(cons(o,cons(i,cons(i,nil)))),suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(zero)))))),bfalse) != btrue # answer(goal).  [back_rewrite(207),rewrite([212(8)])].
% 0.44/1.01  227 rd(cons(o,aux(suc(zero),bfalse))) = suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(suc(zero)))))).  [para(211(a,1),24(a,1,1)),rewrite([211(9),122(9)]),flip(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  229 cons(i,cons(i,nil)) = aux(suc(zero),bfalse).  [para(3(a,1),64(a,1,2,1,1)),rewrite([73(4)])].
% 0.44/1.01  237 $F # answer(goal).  [back_rewrite(214),rewrite([229(6),227(7),31(14),31(12),31(10),31(8),31(6),19(4),15(3)]),xx(a)].
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  Given=115. Generated=653. Kept=227. proofs=1.
% 0.44/1.01  Usable=93. Sos=90. Demods=142. Limbo=8, Disabled=68. Hints=0.
% 0.44/1.01  Megabytes=0.34.
% 0.44/1.01  User_CPU=0.03, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/1.01  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/1.01  
% 0.44/1.01  Process 20103 exit (max_proofs) Wed Apr 29 01:47:36 2026
% 0.44/1.01  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------