↑ Up

Metis---2.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SWX222+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:04:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   58 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  31 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  104 (  53   ~;  35   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  116 (  15 sgn  56   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_026,axiom,
    ! [E] :
      ( nf(lam(E))
    <=> nf(E) ) ).

fof(axiom_027,axiom,
    ! [X4] : nf(var(X4)) ).

fof(axiom_029,axiom,
    ! [Z,Xs] : index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(Z) ).

fof(axiom_033,axiom,
    ! [X,E,Tx2,T1] :
      ( tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1))
    <=> tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1) ) ).

fof(axiom_035,axiom,
    ! [X,Z,X3,Tx3] :
      ( index(X,X3) = just(Tx3)
     => ( tc(X,var(X3),Z)
      <=> Tx3 = Z ) ) ).

fof(goal_036,conjecture,
    ? [E] :
      ( nf(E)
      & tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ? [E] :
      ( nf(E)
      & tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(strip,[],[goal_036]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ? [E] :
        ( nf(E)
        & tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ~ nf(E)
      | ~ tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ~ nf(E)
      | ~ tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [E,T1,Tx2,X] :
      ( ~ tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1))
    <=> ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[axiom_033]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [E,T1,Tx2,X] :
      ( ~ tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1))
    <=> ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [E,T1,Tx2,X] :
      ( ( ~ tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1))
        | tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1) )
      & ( ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1)
        | tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1)) ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [E,T1,Tx2,X] :
      ( ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1)
      | tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1)) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [Tx3,X,X3,Z] :
      ( index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
      | ( Tx3 != Z
      <=> ~ tc(X,var(X3),Z) ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[axiom_035]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    ! [Tx3,X,X3,Z] :
      ( index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
      | ( Tx3 != Z
      <=> ~ tc(X,var(X3),Z) ) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

fof(normalize_0_8,plain,
    ! [Tx3,X,X3,Z] :
      ( ( Tx3 != Z
        | index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
        | tc(X,var(X3),Z) )
      & ( index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
        | ~ tc(X,var(X3),Z)
        | Tx3 = Z ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

fof(normalize_0_9,plain,
    ! [Tx3,X,X3,Z] :
      ( Tx3 != Z
      | index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
      | tc(X,var(X3),Z) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_8]) ).

fof(normalize_0_10,plain,
    ! [Xs,Z] : index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(Z),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[axiom_029]) ).

fof(normalize_0_11,plain,
    ! [Xs,Z] : index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(Z),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_10]) ).

fof(normalize_0_12,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ~ nf(E)
    <=> ~ nf(lam(E)) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[axiom_026]) ).

fof(normalize_0_13,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ~ nf(E)
    <=> ~ nf(lam(E)) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_12]) ).

fof(normalize_0_14,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ( ~ nf(E)
        | nf(lam(E)) )
      & ( ~ nf(lam(E))
        | nf(E) ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_13]) ).

fof(normalize_0_15,plain,
    ! [E] :
      ( ~ nf(E)
      | nf(lam(E)) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_14]) ).

fof(normalize_0_16,plain,
    ! [X4] : nf(var(X4)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[axiom_027]) ).

fof(normalize_0_17,plain,
    ! [X4] : nf(var(X4)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_16]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ nf(E)
    | ~ tc(nil,E,arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ nf(lam(lam(var(zero))))
    | ~ tc(nil,lam(lam(var(zero))),arr(a,arr(b,b))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_0:[bind(E,$fot(lam(lam(var(zero)))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),E,T1)
    | tc(X,lam(E),arr(Tx2,T1)) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ tc(cons(Tx2,X),lam(var(zero)),arr(X_334,X_334))
    | tc(X,lam(lam(var(zero))),arr(Tx2,arr(X_334,X_334))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(E,$fot(lam(var(zero)))),bind(T1,$fot(arr(X_334,X_334)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( Tx3 != Z
    | index(X,X3) != just(Tx3)
    | tc(X,var(X3),Z) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( Z != Z
    | index(X,X3) != just(Z)
    | tc(X,var(X3),Z) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_4:[bind(Tx3,$fot(Z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    Z = Z,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(Z)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( index(X,X3) != just(Z)
    | tc(X,var(X3),Z) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(Z,Z) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ( index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) != just(X_104)
    | tc(cons(Z,Xs),var(zero),X_104) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(X,$fot(cons(Z,Xs))),bind(X3,$fot(zero)),bind(Z,$fot(X_104))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(Z),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) != just(Z)
    | just(Z) != just(X_104)
    | index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(X_104) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ $equal(index(cons(Z,Xs),zero),just(X_104)) ),[0],$fot(just(Z))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( just(Z) != just(X_104)
    | index(cons(Z,Xs),zero) = just(X_104) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(index(cons(Z,Xs),zero),just(Z)) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( just(Z) != just(X_104)
    | tc(cons(Z,Xs),var(zero),X_104) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(index(cons(Z,Xs),zero),just(X_104)) )],[refute_0_11,refute_0_8]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    ( just(X_104) != just(X_104)
    | tc(cons(X_104,Xs),var(zero),X_104) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_12:[bind(Z,$fot(X_104))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    just(X_104) = just(X_104),
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(just(X_104))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    tc(cons(X_104,Xs),var(zero),X_104),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(just(X_104),just(X_104)) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_13]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    tc(cons(X_331,X_333),var(zero),X_331),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_15:[bind(Xs,$fot(X_333)),bind(X_104,$fot(X_331))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ tc(cons(X_331,X_333),var(zero),X_331)
    | tc(X_333,lam(var(zero)),arr(X_331,X_331)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_2:[bind(E,$fot(var(zero))),bind(T1,$fot(X_331)),bind(Tx2,$fot(X_331)),bind(X,$fot(X_333))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    tc(X_333,lam(var(zero)),arr(X_331,X_331)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( tc(cons(X_331,X_333),var(zero),X_331) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    tc(cons(Tx2,X),lam(var(zero)),arr(X_334,X_334)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(X_331,$fot(X_334)),bind(X_333,$fot(cons(Tx2,X)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    tc(X,lam(lam(var(zero))),arr(Tx2,arr(X_334,X_334))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( tc(cons(Tx2,X),lam(var(zero)),arr(X_334,X_334)) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    tc(nil,lam(lam(var(zero))),arr(a,arr(b,b))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(Tx2,$fot(a)),bind(X,$fot(nil)),bind(X_334,$fot(b))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ~ nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( tc(nil,lam(lam(var(zero))),arr(a,arr(b,b))) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ nf(E)
    | nf(lam(E)) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ nf(lam(var(X_29)))
    | nf(lam(lam(var(X_29)))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_23:[bind(E,$fot(lam(var(X_29))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_25,plain,
    nf(var(X4)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ nf(var(X4))
    | nf(lam(var(X4))) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_23:[bind(E,$fot(var(X4)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_27,plain,
    nf(lam(var(X4))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( nf(var(X4)) )],[refute_0_25,refute_0_26]) ).

cnf(refute_0_28,plain,
    nf(lam(var(X_29))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_27:[bind(X4,$fot(X_29))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_29,plain,
    nf(lam(lam(var(X_29)))),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( nf(lam(var(X_29))) )],[refute_0_28,refute_0_24]) ).

cnf(refute_0_30,plain,
    nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_29:[bind(X_29,$fot(zero))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))) )],[refute_0_30,refute_0_22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX222+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime : Tue May  5 12:32:51 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.39/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.58  
% 0.39/0.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------