↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : SWX222-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 01:45:36 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.31s
% Output   : Proof 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWX222-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 15:15:37 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.31  Command-line arguments: --flatten-regeneralise
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 1 (axiom_002): notb(btrue) = bfalse.
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 2 (axiom_012): nf(lam(X)) = nf(X).
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 3 (axiom_054): eq4(X, X) = btrue.
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 4 (axiom_007): andb(btrue, X) = X.
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 5 (axiom_013): nf(var(X)) = btrue.
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 6 (axiom_051): eq(X, X) = btrue.
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 7 (axiom_005): index(cons(X, Y), zero) = just(X).
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 8 (axiom_001): aux(X, Y, Z, just(W)) = eq(W, Y).
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 9 (axiom_015): tc(X, lam(Y), arr(Z, W)) = tc(cons(Z, X), Y, W).
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 10 (axiom_019): tc(X, var(Y), Z) = aux(X, Z, Y, index(X, Y)).
% 0.09/0.31  Axiom 11 (axiom_020): sat_synth_nf_k(X) = notb(andb(nf(X), tc(nil, X, arr(a, arr(b, b))))).
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  Goal 1 (goal): eq4(sat_synth_nf_k(X), bfalse) = btrue.
% 0.09/0.31  The goal is true when:
% 0.09/0.31    X = lam(lam(var(zero)))
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  Proof:
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(sat_synth_nf_k(lam(lam(var(zero)))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 11 (axiom_020) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), tc(nil, lam(lam(var(zero))), arr(a, arr(b, b))))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 9 (axiom_015) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), tc(cons(a, nil), lam(var(zero)), arr(b, b)))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 9 (axiom_015) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), tc(cons(b, cons(a, nil)), var(zero), b))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 10 (axiom_019) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), aux(cons(b, cons(a, nil)), b, zero, index(cons(b, cons(a, nil)), zero)))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 7 (axiom_005) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), aux(cons(b, cons(a, nil)), b, zero, just(b)))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 8 (axiom_001) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(lam(var(zero)))), eq(b, b))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_012) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(lam(var(zero))), eq(b, b))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 2 (axiom_012) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(nf(var(zero)), eq(b, b))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 5 (axiom_013) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(andb(btrue, eq(b, b))), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 4 (axiom_007) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(eq(b, b)), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 6 (axiom_051) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(notb(btrue), bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 1 (axiom_002) }
% 0.09/0.31    eq4(bfalse, bfalse)
% 0.09/0.31  = { by axiom 3 (axiom_054) }
% 0.09/0.31    btrue
% 0.09/0.31  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.09/0.31  
% 0.09/0.31  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------