↑ Up

Otter---3.3.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SWX233-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 07:05:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.96s 2.15s
% Output   : Refutation 1.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   8 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    e_q(prop1(A),bfalse) != btrue,
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    f(nil) = btrue,
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    prop1(A) = e_q(f(A),bfalse),
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    e_q(btrue,bfalse) = bfalse,
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    e_q(A,A) = btrue,
    file('SWX233-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    e_q(e_q(f(A),bfalse),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[1]),20]),
    [iquote('back_demod,1,demod,20')] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    btrue != btrue,
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[27,15]),24,26]),
    [iquote('para_into,27.1.1.1.1,15.1.1,demod,24,26')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[28,2]),
    [iquote('binary,28.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SWX233-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May  5 13:08:54 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.96/2.15  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.96/2.15  The process was started by sandbox on n031.cluster.edu,
% 1.96/2.15  Tue May  5 13:08:54 2026
% 1.96/2.15  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 5488.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.96/2.15  set(auto).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.96/2.15  clear(print_given).
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  list(usable).
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] A=A.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] aux(Z,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] aux(Z,bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] h(nil)=nil.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] h(cons(Y,Xs))=Xs.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] g(btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] g(bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] f(nil)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] f(cons(Y,Z))=aux(Z,f(Z)).
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] prop1(X)=e_q(f(X),bfalse).
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] e_q(bfalse,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] e_q(btrue,bfalse)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] e_q(X,X)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  0 [] e_q(prop1(X),bfalse)!=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  end_of_list.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.96/2.15  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.96/2.15     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ------------> process usable:
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] e_q(prop1(A),bfalse)!=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ------------> process sos:
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 3 [] aux(A,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] aux(A,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 5 [] aux(A,bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] aux(A,bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 7 [] h(nil)=nil.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] h(nil)=nil.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 9 [] h(cons(A,B))=B.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] h(cons(A,B))=B.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 11 [] g(btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] g(btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 13 [] g(bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] g(bfalse)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 15 [] f(nil)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 16 [new_demod,15] f(nil)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 17 [] f(cons(A,B))=aux(B,f(B)).
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 18 [new_demod,17] f(cons(A,B))=aux(B,f(B)).
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 19 [] prop1(A)=e_q(f(A),bfalse).
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 20 [new_demod,19] prop1(A)=e_q(f(A),bfalse).
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] e_q(bfalse,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 22 [new_demod,21] e_q(bfalse,btrue)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 23 [] e_q(btrue,bfalse)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 24 [new_demod,23] e_q(btrue,bfalse)=bfalse.
% 1.96/2.15  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 25 [] e_q(A,A)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15  ---> New Demodulator: 26 [new_demod,25] e_q(A,A)=btrue.
% 1.96/2.15    Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 16.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 18.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 20.
% 1.96/2.15      >> back demodulating 1 with 20.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 22.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 24.
% 1.96/2.15  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 26.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 29 [binary,28.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.96/2.15  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.96/2.15  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.96/2.15  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ============ end of search ============
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.96/2.15  clauses given                 13
% 1.96/2.15  clauses generated             23
% 1.96/2.15  clauses kept                  16
% 1.96/2.15  clauses forward subsumed      23
% 1.96/2.15  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.96/2.15  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.96/2.15  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.96/2.15  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.96/2.15  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.96/2.15  
% 1.96/2.15  Process 5488 finished Tue May  5 13:08:55 2026
% 1.96/2.15  Otter interrupted
% 1.96/2.15  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------