↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWX239-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:14:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.87s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   55 (  55 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (  54 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_077,axiom,
    eps2(y(X1,X2)) = andb(eps2(X1),eps2(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_077) ).

cnf(axiom_087,axiom,
    rec(X1,nil2) = eps2(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_087) ).

cnf(axiom_075,axiom,
    eps2(eps) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_075) ).

cnf(axiom_078,axiom,
    eps2(star(X1)) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_078) ).

cnf(axiom_081,axiom,
    step(atom(X1),X2) = aux(X2,X1,eq(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_081) ).

cnf(axiom_095,axiom,
    reck2(atom(X1),cons2(X2,nil2)) = eq(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_095) ).

cnf(axiom_110,axiom,
    eq(X1,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_110) ).

cnf(axiom,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,btrue) = eps,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom) ).

cnf(axiom_073,axiom,
    andb(btrue,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_073) ).

cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    eq2(prop_same(X1,X2),bfalse) != btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

cnf(axiom_084,axiom,
    step(star(X1),X2) = y(step(X1,X2),star(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_084) ).

cnf(axiom_088,axiom,
    rec(X1,cons2(X2,X3)) = rec(step(X1,X2),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_088) ).

cnf(axiom_100,axiom,
    reck2(star(X1),cons2(X2,X3)) = aux3(X1,X2,X3,notb(eps2(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_100) ).

cnf(axiom_101,axiom,
    prop_same(X1,X2) = eq2(rec(X1,X2),reck2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_101) ).

cnf(axiom_071,axiom,
    notb(btrue) = bfalse,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_071) ).

cnf(axiom_005,axiom,
    aux3(X1,X2,X3,bfalse) = bfalse,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_005) ).

cnf(axiom_109,axiom,
    eq2(btrue,bfalse) = bfalse,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_109) ).

cnf(axiom_111,axiom,
    eq2(X1,X1) = btrue,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_111) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    eps2(y(X1,X2)) = andb(eps2(X1),eps2(X2)),
    axiom_077 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    rec(X1,nil2) = eps2(X1),
    axiom_087 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    eps2(eps) = btrue,
    axiom_075 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    eps2(star(X1)) = btrue,
    axiom_078 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rec(y(X1,X2),nil2) = andb(rec(X1,nil2),rec(X2,nil2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rec(eps,nil2) = btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    step(atom(X1),X2) = aux(X2,X1,eq(X1,X2)),
    axiom_081 ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    reck2(atom(X1),cons2(X2,nil2)) = eq(X1,X2),
    axiom_095 ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    eq(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_110 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    rec(star(X1),nil2) = btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    andb(rec(X1,nil2),btrue) = rec(y(X1,eps),nil2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    step(atom(X1),X2) = aux(X2,X1,reck2(atom(X1),cons2(X2,nil2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    reck2(atom(X1),cons2(X1,nil2)) = btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    aux(X1,X2,btrue) = eps,
    axiom ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    andb(btrue,X1) = X1,
    axiom_073 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    eq2(prop_same(X1,X2),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    rec(y(X1,star(X2)),nil2) = rec(y(X1,eps),nil2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
    step(star(X1),X2) = y(step(X1,X2),star(X1)),
    axiom_084 ).

cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
    rec(X1,cons2(X2,X3)) = rec(step(X1,X2),X3),
    axiom_088 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    step(atom(X1),X1) = eps,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    rec(y(eps,X1),nil2) = rec(X1,nil2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    reck2(star(X1),cons2(X2,X3)) = aux3(X1,X2,X3,notb(eps2(X1))),
    axiom_100 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    eq2(prop_same(X1,X2),bfalse) != btrue,
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
    prop_same(X1,X2) = eq2(rec(X1,X2),reck2(X1,X2)),
    axiom_101 ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    rec(y(step(X1,X2),eps),nil2) = rec(star(X1),cons2(X2,nil2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    step(star(atom(X1)),X1) = y(eps,star(atom(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    rec(y(y(eps,X1),X2),nil2) = rec(y(X1,X2),nil2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_38]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    rec(y(star(X1),X2),nil2) = rec(X2,nil2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_27]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    reck2(star(X1),cons2(X2,X3)) = aux3(X1,X2,X3,notb(rec(X1,nil2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    notb(btrue) = bfalse,
    axiom_071 ).

cnf(c_0_48,axiom,
    aux3(X1,X2,X3,bfalse) = bfalse,
    axiom_005 ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    eq2(eq2(rec(X1,X2),reck2(X1,X2)),bfalse) != btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    rec(star(star(atom(X1))),cons2(X1,nil2)) = btrue,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    reck2(star(star(X1)),cons2(X2,X3)) = bfalse,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_27]),c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,axiom,
    eq2(btrue,bfalse) = bfalse,
    axiom_109 ).

cnf(c_0_53,axiom,
    eq2(X1,X1) = btrue,
    axiom_111 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]),c_0_51]),c_0_52]),c_0_53])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWX239-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:37:35 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.87/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.87/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.87/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 558372 completed with status 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.87/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.87/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.87/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.87/0.65  % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.87/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % SubtermCWHack with pid 558377 completed with status 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.87/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.87/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.87/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.87/0.65  % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.87/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.87/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.87/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.87/0.65  
% 0.87/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.87/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.87/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.87/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.87/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 113
% 0.87/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.87/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 110
% 0.87/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 556
% 0.87/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 45
% 0.87/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 99
% 0.87/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 412
% 0.87/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 25
% 0.87/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 3751
% 0.87/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2701
% 0.87/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 3751
% 0.87/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3570
% 0.87/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 2445
% 0.87/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.87/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 387
% 0.87/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 353
% 0.87/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.87/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 0.87/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2164
% 0.87/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2164
% 0.87/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 28
% 0.87/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 534
% 0.87/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 410
% 0.87/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 25
% 0.87/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.87/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 52704
% 0.87/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.87/0.65  
% 0.87/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.87/0.65  % User time                : 0.080 s
% 0.87/0.65  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.87/0.65  % Total time               : 0.089 s
% 0.87/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 3444 pages
% 0.87/0.65  
% 0.87/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.87/0.65  % User time                : 0.354 s
% 0.87/0.65  % System time              : 0.049 s
% 0.87/0.65  % Total time               : 0.403 s
% 0.87/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.87/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------