↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SYN000_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:38:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.17s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   72 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  36   ~;  33   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   2 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  20   !;  12   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_1,type,
    $bool: $tType ).

tff(type_def_5,type,
    new: $tType ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    newc: new ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    newf: ( $i * new ) > new ).

tff(pred_def_11,type,
    newp: ( $i * new ) > $o ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ q(X0,a)
       => p(X0) )
    <=> ? [X1,X2] :
          ( r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
        <~> ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',useful_connectives) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    p(h),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_hypothesis) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ? [X0] : p(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_conjecture) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] : p(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f10]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( q(X0,a)
        | p(X0) )
    <=> ? [X1,X2] :
          ( r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
        <~> ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( ~ q(X0,a)
          & ~ p(X0) )
        | ? [X1,X2] :
            ( ( r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( s(f(f(f(b))))
              | r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2)) ) )
        | q(X0,a)
        | p(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( ~ q(X0,a)
          & ~ p(X0) )
        | ? [X1,X2] :
            ( ( r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( s(f(f(f(b))))
              | r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2)) ) )
        | q(X0,a)
        | p(X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( ~ q(X0,a)
          & ~ p(X0) )
        | ? [X3,X4] :
            ( ( r(X0,f(X3),g(X0,f(X3),X4))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( ~ r(X0,f(X3),g(X0,f(X3),X4))
              | s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( s(f(f(f(b))))
              | r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2)) ) )
        | q(X0,a)
        | p(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ( ~ q(X0,a)
          & ~ p(X0) )
        | ( ( r(X0,f(sK3(X0)),g(X0,f(sK3(X0)),sK4(X0)))
            | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
          & ( ~ r(X0,f(sK3(X0)),g(X0,f(sK3(X0)),sK4(X0)))
            | s(f(f(f(b)))) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( ~ r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2))
              | ~ s(f(f(f(b)))) )
            & ( s(f(f(f(b))))
              | r(X0,f(X1),g(X0,f(X1),X2)) ) )
        | q(X0,a)
        | p(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4]),skolemize(X3,sK3(X0)),skolemize(X4,sK4(X0))],[f31]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ p(X0)
      | ~ r(X0,f(sK3(X0)),g(X0,f(sK3(X0)),sK4(X0)))
      | s(f(f(f(b)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    p(h),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( s(f(f(f(b))))
      | ~ p(X0)
      | ~ r(X0,f(sK3(X0)),g(X0,f(sK3(X0)),sK4(X0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    p(h),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_65]) ).

tcf(c_96,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_88]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN000_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 23:44:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.41  
% 0.09/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.17/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.17/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.17/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.17/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 1.17/1.27  % 
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------