↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SYN003-1.006 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:31:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   47 (  17 unt;   0 nHn;  47 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   92 (   0 equ;  48 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;  13 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(qq_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qq_1) ).

cnf(pqp_1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_1
    | ~ p_1
    | p_2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pqp_1) ).

cnf(base_3,negated_conjecture,
    q,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',base_3) ).

cnf(qq_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qq_2) ).

cnf(pqp_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_2
    | ~ p_2
    | p_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pqp_2) ).

cnf(base_1,negated_conjecture,
    p_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',base_1) ).

cnf(qq_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qq_3) ).

cnf(pqp_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_3
    | ~ p_3
    | p_4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pqp_3) ).

cnf(qq_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qq_4) ).

cnf(pqp_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_4
    | ~ p_4
    | p_5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pqp_4) ).

cnf(qq_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',qq_5) ).

cnf(pqp_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_5
    | ~ p_5
    | p_6 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pqp_5) ).

cnf(base_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_6,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',base_2) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qq_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_1
    | ~ p_1
    | p_2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pqp_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_1 ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    q,
    base_3 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qq_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_2
    | ~ p_2
    | p_3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pqp_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_1
    | ~ p_1
    | p_2 ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    p_1,
    base_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    q_1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_2 ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qq_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_3
    | ~ p_3
    | p_4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pqp_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_2
    | ~ p_2
    | p_3 ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    p_2,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    q_2,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_3 ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_4 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qq_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_4
    | ~ p_4
    | p_5 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pqp_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_3
    | ~ p_3
    | p_4 ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    p_3,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    q_3,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_4 ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_5 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[qq_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_5
    | ~ p_5
    | p_6 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pqp_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_4
    | ~ p_4
    | p_5 ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    p_4,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    q_4,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q
    | q_5 ),
    c_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_6,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[base_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ q_5
    | ~ p_5
    | p_6 ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    p_5,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    q_5,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p_6,
    c_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_44])]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SYN003-1.006 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 10:38:49 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % new_bool_1 with pid 3849041 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.41  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3849046 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.41  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.41  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 24
% 0.14/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 24
% 0.14/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 24
% 0.14/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 23
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.14/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 18
% 0.14/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 32
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 16
% 0.14/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 18
% 0.14/0.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.14/0.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 515
% 0.14/0.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 43
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.41  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------