%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:13 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.64s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.08/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 23:40:09 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.56/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.57/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.57/0.63 % Transform :cnf % 0.57/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.57/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.57/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.57/0.63 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.63 % File : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.57/0.63 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.57/0.63 % Problem : A problem to demonstrate the usefulness of relevancy testing % 0.57/0.63 % Version : Biased. % 0.57/0.63 % English : % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.63 % Refs : [WL89] Wilson & Loveland (1989), Incorporating Relevancy Test % 0.57/0.63 % Source : [WL89] % 0.57/0.63 % Names : Figure 3 [WL89] % 0.57/0.63 % 0.57/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.57/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0 % 0.57/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 3 unt; 3 nHn; 6 RR) % 0.57/0.64 % Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 5 neg) % 0.57/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg) % 0.57/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg) % 0.57/0.64 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 prp; 0-0 aty) % 0.57/0.64 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 0.57/0.64 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn) % 0.57/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 % Comments : % 0.57/0.64 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 ~ p ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 ~ q ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 r ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 ( ~ r % 0.57/0.64 | a % 0.57/0.64 | b ) ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 ( ~ r % 0.57/0.64 | p % 0.57/0.64 | c % 0.57/0.64 | d ) ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.57/0.64 ( ~ r % 0.57/0.64 | p % 0.57/0.64 | q ) ). % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.64 % Proof found % 0.57/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.57/0.64 % SZS output start Proof % 0.57/0.64 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.57/0.64 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0) % 0.57/0.64 %MaxLitNum:4 % 0.57/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.57/0.64 %SharedTerms:11 % 0.57/0.64 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 % 0.57/0.64 %singleGoalClaCount:3 % 0.57/0.64 [1]P1(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 [2]~P2(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 [3]~P7(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 [4]P2(a5000)+P7(a5000)+~P1(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 [5]P3(a5000)+P4(a5000)+~P1(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 [6]P2(a5000)+P5(a5000)+P6(a5000)+~P1(a5000) % 0.57/0.64 %EqnAxiom % 0.57/0.64 % 0.57/0.64 %------------------------------------------- % 0.57/0.64 cnf(7,plain, % 0.57/0.64 ($false), % 0.57/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,1,4]), % 0.57/0.64 ['proof']). % 0.57/0.64 % SZS output end Proof % 0.57/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------