%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:13 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.61s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 22:29:08 EDT 2024 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.52/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.54/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % Transform :cnf % 0.54/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.54/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % File : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.54/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic % 0.54/0.61 % Problem : A problem to demonstrate the usefulness of relevancy testing % 0.54/0.61 % Version : Biased. % 0.54/0.61 % English : % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Refs : [WL89] Wilson & Loveland (1989), Incorporating Relevancy Test % 0.54/0.61 % Source : [WL89] % 0.54/0.61 % Names : Figure 8 [WL89] % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.54/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0 % 0.54/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 7 RR) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty) % 0.54/0.61 % Number of variables : 9 ( 6 sgn) % 0.54/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 % Comments : % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ~ p(c,X,Y) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ~ q(X,c,Y) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ~ r(X,Y,c) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 s(a) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 s(b) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 s(c) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture, % 0.54/0.61 ( ~ s(X) % 0.54/0.61 | ~ s(Y) % 0.54/0.61 | ~ s(Z) % 0.54/0.61 | p(X,Y,Z) % 0.54/0.61 | q(X,Y,Z) % 0.54/0.61 | r(X,Y,Z) ) ). % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 % Proof found % 0.54/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output start Proof % 0.54/0.61 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0) % 0.54/0.61 %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:9) % 0.54/0.61 %MaxLitNum:6 % 0.54/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:0 % 0.54/0.61 %SharedTerms:6 % 0.54/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 % 0.54/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:6 % 0.54/0.61 [1]P1(a1) % 0.54/0.61 [2]P1(a2) % 0.54/0.61 [3]P1(a3) % 0.54/0.61 [4]~P2(x41,x42,a1) % 0.54/0.61 [5]~P3(x51,a1,x52) % 0.54/0.61 [6]~P4(a1,x61,x62) % 0.54/0.61 [7]P3(x71,x72,x73)+P2(x71,x72,x73)+~P1(x73)+~P1(x72)+~P1(x71)+P4(x71,x72,x73) % 0.54/0.61 %EqnAxiom % 0.54/0.61 % 0.54/0.61 %------------------------------------------- % 0.54/0.61 cnf(8,plain, % 0.54/0.61 ($false), % 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,4,1,6,7]), % 0.54/0.61 ['proof']). % 0.54/0.61 % SZS output end Proof % 0.54/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------